Geier A S, Wellmann I, Wellmann J, Kajüter H, Heidinger O, Hempel G, Hense H W
Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 D3, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 D3, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;106(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
We evaluated the patterns and determinants that influence the selection, timing and duration of first-line antihyperglycaemic drug (AHD) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany, focusing specifically on treatment-naive AHD initiators.
Pharmacy dispensing claims data were linked with a cohort of patients newly enrolled in a German Disease Management Program for type 2 diabetes (DMP-DM2) between 2003 and 2009. We examined uptake of first-line pharmacotherapy in previously unmedicated patients and identified predictors of receiving AHD therapy in general and metformin in particular using multivariable regression analyses.
There were 27,138 unmedicated patients with type 2 diabetes and 47.0% of them were started on AHD treatment within 5 years after enrollment. Initial severity of diabetes was the major predictor of receiving first-line pharmacotherapy. Metformin accounted for 63% of newly prescribed AHD in 2003 and more than 80% in 2009 while sulfonylureas accounted for only 10%. Initiating metformin as first-line AHD was associated with younger age, higher BMI, lower HbA1c, and shorter diabetes duration (multivariate p<0.001 for all). Therapy switch or step-up was less frequent among metformin initiators than sulfonylurea initiators.
The majority of patients were not started on AHD therapy within 5 years after enrollment. In line with recent therapy guidelines, current first-line antihyperglycaemic treatment was increasingly based on metformin. AHD initiators started on sulfonylurea were generally more advanced in their disease and were started later on primary pharmacotherapy.
我们评估了影响德国2型糖尿病患者一线降糖药物(AHD)治疗选择、时机和疗程的模式及决定因素,特别关注初治AHD起始者。
药房配药报销数据与2003年至2009年间新纳入德国2型糖尿病疾病管理项目(DMP-DM2)的患者队列相关联。我们研究了既往未接受药物治疗患者的一线药物治疗情况,并使用多变量回归分析确定接受AHD治疗尤其是二甲双胍治疗的预测因素。
有27138例未接受药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者,其中47.0%在入组后5年内开始接受AHD治疗。糖尿病的初始严重程度是接受一线药物治疗的主要预测因素。二甲双胍在2003年新处方AHD中占63%,在2009年占80%以上,而磺脲类药物仅占10%。以二甲双胍作为一线AHD起始治疗与年龄较轻、体重指数较高、糖化血红蛋白较低以及糖尿病病程较短相关(所有多变量p<0.001)。与磺脲类起始者相比,二甲双胍起始者中治疗转换或强化治疗的频率较低。
大多数患者在入组后5年内未开始接受AHD治疗。与近期治疗指南一致,目前的一线降糖治疗越来越多地基于二甲双胍。以磺脲类药物起始AHD治疗的患者通常病情更严重,开始一线药物治疗的时间更晚。