Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Med. 2012 Mar;125(3):302.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.033.
Six oral medication classes have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although all of these agents effectively lower blood glucose, the evidence supporting their impact on other clinical events is variable. There also are substantial cost differences between agents. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends in the use of specific drugs for the initial management of type 2 diabetes and to estimate the economic consequences of non-recommended care.
We studied a cohort of 254,973 patients, aged 18 to 100 years, who were newly initiated on oral hypoglycemic monotherapy between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008, by using prescription claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Linear regression models were used to assess whether medication initiation patterns changed over time. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent predictors of receiving initial therapy with metformin. We then measured the economic consequences of prescribing patterns by drug class for both patients and the insurer.
Over the course of the study period, the proportion of patients initially treated with metformin increased from 51% to 65%, whereas those receiving sulfonylureas decreased from 26% to 18% (P<.001 for both). There was a significant decline in the use of thiazolidinediones (20.1%-8.3%, P<.001) and an increase in prescriptions for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (0.4%-7.3%, P<.001). Younger patients, women, and patients receiving drug benefits through Medicare were least likely to initiate treatment with metformin. Combined patient and insurer spending for patients who were initiated on alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was $677 over a 6-month period compared with $116 and $118 for patients initiated on metformin or a sulfonylurea, respectively, a cost difference of approximately $1120 annually per patient.
Approximately 35% of patients initiating an oral hypoglycemic drug did not receive recommended initial therapy with metformin. These practice patterns also have substantial implications for health care spending.
食品和药物管理局已经批准了六种口服药物类别用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。尽管所有这些药物都能有效降低血糖,但它们对其他临床事件的影响的证据是不同的。药物之间也存在显著的成本差异。我们旨在评估 2 型糖尿病初始管理中特定药物使用的时间趋势,并估计非推荐治疗的经济后果。
我们研究了一个由 254973 名年龄在 18 至 100 岁之间的患者组成的队列,这些患者在 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间首次接受口服降糖单药治疗,使用来自大型药房福利管理者的处方数据。线性回归模型用于评估药物起始模式是否随时间发生变化。构建多变量逻辑回归模型以确定接受二甲双胍初始治疗的独立预测因素。然后,我们按药物类别测量了患者和保险公司的处方模式的经济后果。
在研究期间,最初接受二甲双胍治疗的患者比例从 51%增加到 65%,而接受磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者比例从 26%下降到 18%(均<.001)。噻唑烷二酮类药物的使用显著下降(20.1%-8.3%,<.001),二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的处方增加(0.4%-7.3%,<.001)。年轻患者、女性和通过医疗保险获得药物福利的患者最不可能开始接受二甲双胍治疗。在接受 6 个月治疗后,接受α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、噻唑烷二酮类药物、格列奈类药物或二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂治疗的患者的患者和保险公司的总支出为 677 美元,而接受二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者的支出分别为 116 美元和 118 美元,每年每位患者的成本差异约为 1120 美元。
约 35%的开始使用口服降糖药物的患者未接受推荐的二甲双胍初始治疗。这些实践模式也对医疗保健支出产生了重大影响。