Turkeltaub Paul C, Yearwood Edilma L, Friedmann Erika
1 Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University , Washington, DC.
J Altern Complement Med. 2014 Oct;20(10):792-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2014.0142. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
While massage has been removed from nursing curricula, studies have reported massage as safe and effective for stress reduction, relaxation, pain relief, fatigue, and quality of life.
To compare the efficacy of two intensities of touch administered during two seated massages on the attitudes of nursing students toward touch for their self-care and patient care.
Nursing students who volunteered gave institutional review board-approved written informed consent to undergo massage by a licensed massage therapist.
SETTINGS/LOCATION: A private room adjacent to the nursing lab in a school of nursing.
Brief seated massages of differing intensities. Each participant received low-intensity and high-intensity touch in a two-block, randomized order, within-subjects design. Linear mixed models nested within subject and random intercept analyses were used to test hypotheses in this two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover design.
Health questionnaires/visual analogue scales pertaining to physical/affective/and attitudinal status were completed before and after each massage.
Twenty-nine participants (93% female, 83% single) completed the study. Before massage, the optimal intensity of touch anticipated for self-comfort was 6.6 (0=no pressure;10=most intense pressure imaginable). The mean touch intensities were 6.7 for high-intensity massage and 0.5 for low-intensity (p<0.001). The overall percentage differences (feeling better or worse) following massage were as follows: low intensity, 37.5% better; high intensity, 62.7% better (p<0.001). Significantly more improvement was reported for energy, pain, stress, and feeling physically uptight after high-intensity compared with low-intensity (p<0.03). Participants were more likely to both receive touch for self-care and provide touch for patient care after experiencing high- versus low-intensity massage (p<0.01).
High-intensity seated massage was more efficacious than low-intensity massage and positively influenced nursing student attitudes toward the inclusion of massage in self-care/patient care. The role of touch for self-care/patient care in the nursing curricula merits reconsideration.
虽然按摩已从护理课程中移除,但研究报告称按摩在减轻压力、放松身心、缓解疼痛、消除疲劳和改善生活质量方面是安全有效的。
比较两次坐式按摩中两种触摸强度对护理专业学生在自我护理和患者护理中对触摸态度的影响。
自愿参与的护理专业学生签署了经机构审查委员会批准的书面知情同意书,接受有执照的按摩治疗师的按摩。
设置/地点:一所护理学院护理实验室旁边的一个私人房间。
不同强度的简短坐式按摩。在两阶段、随机顺序、受试者内设计中,每位参与者接受低强度和高强度触摸。在这个两治疗、两序列、两阶段交叉设计中,使用嵌套在受试者内的线性混合模型和随机截距分析来检验假设。
在每次按摩前后完成与身体/情感/态度状态相关的健康问卷/视觉模拟量表。
29名参与者(93%为女性,83%为单身)完成了研究。按摩前,预期用于自我舒适的最佳触摸强度为6.6(0=无压力;10=可想象的最强烈压力)。高强度按摩的平均触摸强度为6.7,低强度为0.5(p<0.001)。按摩后总体百分比差异(感觉更好或更差)如下:低强度,感觉更好的占37.5%;高强度,感觉更好的占62.7%(p<0.001)。与低强度相比,高强度按摩后在精力、疼痛、压力和身体紧绷感方面的改善显著更多(p<0.03)。与低强度按摩相比,参与者在经历高强度按摩后更有可能接受自我护理触摸并为患者护理提供触摸(p<0.01)。
高强度坐式按摩比低强度按摩更有效,并对护理专业学生在自我护理/患者护理中纳入按摩的态度产生积极影响。触摸在护理课程中用于自我护理/患者护理的作用值得重新考虑。