• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新手在单孔手术模拟器中使用的腹腔镜手持器械的人体工程学比较

Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices.

作者信息

Riggle Jakeb D, Miller Emily E, McCrory Bernadette, Meitl Alex, Lim Eric, Hallbeck M Susan, LaGrange Chad A

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, NE , USA.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Apr;24(2):68-76. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.946426. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

DOI:10.3109/13645706.2014.946426
PMID:25142199
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-site surgery improves cosmesis but increases procedural difficulty. Enhanced instruments could improve procedural efficiency leading to better patient outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One pair of non-articulating (straight) and two different pairs of articulating laparoscopic instruments were evaluated using a peg-transfer surgical task simulator by premedical college students. The instruments were comparatively tested using task performance measures, ergonomic measures, and participant questionnaires.

RESULTS

The straight instrument produced significantly higher task performance scores and lower task times compared to both articulating instruments (p < 0.05). The straight instrument required less muscle activation and less wrist deviation than the articulating instruments to perform the same task. Participants rated the straight instrument significantly easier to use and less difficult to complete the task than with either articulating instrument (p < 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study suggests that novices have difficulty using articulating instruments and perform better using straight laparoscopic instruments when first attempting LESS surgical tasks. Although a study with post-graduate medical trainees is needed to confirm these results, trainees should initially practice LESS with non-articulating instruments to gain proficiency at basic laparoscopic tasks. Additionally, redesigning articulating instruments to specifically address the spatial constraints and learning curve of LESS may also improve trainee performance and instrument usability.

摘要

背景

单孔手术改善了美观效果,但增加了手术难度。改进的器械可以提高手术效率,从而带来更好的患者预后。

材料与方法

医学院预科学生使用移钉手术任务模拟器对一对非关节式(直的)和两对不同的关节式腹腔镜器械进行了评估。通过任务绩效指标、人体工程学指标和参与者问卷对器械进行了对比测试。

结果

与两种关节式器械相比,直器械产生的任务绩效得分显著更高,任务时间更短(p < 0.05)。在执行相同任务时,直器械比关节式器械需要更少的肌肉激活和更少的手腕偏斜。参与者对直器械的评价是,与两种关节式器械相比,使用起来明显更容易,完成任务的难度更小(两者p < 0.05)。

结论

这项探索性研究表明,新手在首次尝试单孔腹腔镜手术任务时,使用关节式器械存在困难,而使用直的腹腔镜器械表现更好。尽管需要对医学研究生进行研究以证实这些结果,但学员最初应使用非关节式器械练习单孔腹腔镜手术,以熟练掌握基本的腹腔镜手术任务。此外,重新设计关节式器械以专门解决单孔腹腔镜手术的空间限制和学习曲线问题,也可能提高学员的表现和器械的易用性。

相似文献

1
Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices.新手在单孔手术模拟器中使用的腹腔镜手持器械的人体工程学比较
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Apr;24(2):68-76. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.946426. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
2
A randomized controlled study to establish the effect of articulating instruments on performance in single-incision laparoscopic surgery.一项随机对照研究,以确定关节镜器械对单切口腹腔镜手术操作的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;72(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
3
Comparison of different sets of instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in a surgical simulator with novices.在手术模拟器中对不同器械组用于新手腹腔镜单孔手术的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):264-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12447. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
4
The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments.灵活性与机动性的权衡:使用铰接式腹腔镜器械的任务表现。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2697-701. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0462-y. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
5
A randomised comparative study evaluating learning curves of novices in a basic single-incision laparoscopic surgery task.一项随机对照研究评估新手在基础单切口腹腔镜手术任务中的学习曲线。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):569-75. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2113-1. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
6
A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Impact of Instrument and Laparoscope Length on Performance and Learning Curve in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery.一项评估器械和腹腔镜长度对单孔腹腔镜手术操作及学习曲线影响的随机对照研究。
Surg Innov. 2015 Dec;22(6):621-8. doi: 10.1177/1553350615572657. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
7
Rigid vs articulating instrumentation for task completion in single-port surgery.单孔手术中用于完成任务的刚性器械与可关节式器械对比
Am J Surg. 2016 May;211(5):903-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Training With Curved Laparoscopic Instruments in Single-Port Setting Improves Performance Using Straight Instruments: A Prospective Randomized Simulation Study.单孔环境下使用弯曲腹腔镜器械训练可提高使用直器械的操作性能:一项前瞻性随机模拟研究。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.013.
9
Kinematic and ergonomic assessment of laparoendoscopic single-site surgical instruments during simulator training tasks.在模拟器训练任务期间对腹腔镜单孔手术器械进行运动学和人体工程学评估。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jul;62:118-130. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator.培训和器械类型对单孔腹腔镜手术表现的影响:使用手术模拟器进行随机比较的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3798-804. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1791-1. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in objective assessment of ergonomics in endoscopic surgery: a review.内镜手术工效学客观评估的研究进展:综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1281194. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281194. eCollection 2023.
2
Ergonomic risk factors and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in clinical physiotherapy.临床物理治疗中的人体工程学风险因素和与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;10:1083609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1083609. eCollection 2022.
3
Single incision laparoscopic fundoplication: A systematic review of the literature.
单切口腹腔镜胃底折叠术:文献系统评价
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar 27;11(3):179-190. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i3.179.
4
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于单切口内镜手术的共识声明。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
Impact of novel shift handle laparoscopic tool on wrist ergonomics and task performance.新型换挡手柄腹腔镜工具对腕部人体工程学和任务执行的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3480-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4634-7. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)对手术医生压力和工作量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1205-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4332-5. Epub 2015 Jul 21.