Menescardi Cristina, Lopez-Lopez Jose A, Falco Coral, Hernandez-Mendo Antonio, Estevan Isaac
1Department of Applied Sciences in Physical Activity and Management, Catholic University of Valencia "San Vicente Mártir," Valencia, Spain; and 2Department of Social Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Feb;29(2):466-71. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000645.
The aims of this study were to analyze tactical behavior (direct attacks and indirect attacks, in addition to anticipatory, simultaneous, and posterior counterattacks) according to competition round and match, and to compare tactics of competitors (winners and nonwinners) in a university taekwondo championship. The analysis included 334 individual performances from 204 athletes over 169 bouts in the National University Championship. A 2-way repeated measure analysis of variance was conducted with "round" (at 3 levels: first, second, and third) as the within-subject factor and match outcome (at 2 levels: winning and nonwinning) as the between-subject factor. The results of this study show that tactical behavior patterns of winners and nonwinners differ. In addition, these differences vary over the course of a bout (p ≤ 0.05). Winners perform fewer direct and indirect attacks than nonwinners perform, but execute more anticipatory, simultaneous, and posterior counterattacks. In terms of tactics in each round, there are more frequent direct and anticipatory actions in the third round than in earlier rounds (p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, coaches should conduct tactical training for athletes in a variety of counterattacks, especially in the third round.
本研究的目的是根据比赛轮次和场次分析战术行为(直接攻击和间接攻击,以及预判性、同步性和后置反击),并比较大学跆拳道锦标赛中参赛者(获胜者和未获胜者)的战术。分析涵盖了全国大学锦标赛中204名运动员在169场比赛中的334次个人表现。以“轮次”(3个水平:第一轮、第二轮和第三轮)作为组内因素,比赛结果(2个水平:获胜和未获胜)作为组间因素,进行了双向重复测量方差分析。本研究结果表明,获胜者和未获胜者的战术行为模式不同。此外,这些差异在一场比赛过程中有所变化(p≤0.05)。获胜者比未获胜者进行的直接和间接攻击更少,但执行的预判性、同步性和后置反击更多。就每一轮的战术而言,第三轮比前几轮有更频繁的直接和预判性动作(p≤0.05)。因此,教练应为运动员开展各种反击方面的战术训练,尤其是在第三轮。