• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中快速康复外科与传统围手术期护理的Meta分析

Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Jun-Hua, Sun Jing-Xu, Gao Peng, Chen Xiao-Wan, Song Yong-Xi, Huang Xuan-Zhang, Xu Hui-Mian, Wang Zhen-Ning

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 23;14:607. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-607.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-14-607
PMID:25148902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4161840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both laparoscopic and fast-track surgery (FTS) have shown some advantages in colorectal surgery. However, the effectiveness of using both methods together is unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the effects of FTS with those of traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases for eligible studies until April 2014. The main end points were the duration of the postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus after surgery, time of first bowel movement, total postoperative complication rate, readmission rate, and mortality.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials and 5 clinical controlled trials with 1,317 patients were eligible for analysis. The duration of the postoperative hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.64 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.25 to -1.03; p < 0.001), time to first flatus (WMD, -0.40 day; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.04; p = 0.03), time of first bowel movement (WMD, -0.98 day; 95% CI, -1.45 to -0.52; p < 0.001), and total postoperative complication rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; p < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the FTS group. No significant differences were noted in the readmission rate (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-1.01; p = 0.06) or mortality (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.42-5.71; p = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, FTS is associated with a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay, more rapid postoperative recovery, and, notably, greater safety than is expected from traditional care.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术和快速康复外科(FTS)在结直肠癌手术中均显示出一定优势。然而,两种方法联合使用的效果尚不清楚。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以比较FTS与传统围手术期护理在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的效果。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Ovid数据库,以查找截至2014年4月的符合条件的研究。主要终点包括术后住院时间、术后首次排气时间、首次排便时间、术后总并发症发生率、再入院率和死亡率。

结果

五项随机对照试验和五项临床对照试验共1317例患者符合分析条件。FTS组的术后住院时间(加权平均差[WMD],-1.64天;95%置信区间[CI],-2.25至-1.03;p < 0.001)、首次排气时间(WMD,-0.40天;95%CI,-0.77至-0.04;p = 0.03)、首次排便时间(WMD,-0.98天;95%CI,-1.45至-0.52;p < 0.001)和术后总并发症发生率(风险比[RR],0.67;95%CI,0.56 - 0.80;p < 0.001)均显著降低。再入院率(RR,0.64;95%CI,0.41 - 1.01;p = 0.06)或死亡率(RR,1.55;95%CI,0.42 - 5.71;p = 0.51)无显著差异。

结论

在接受腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的患者中,FTS与术后住院时间显著缩短、术后恢复更快相关,值得注意的是,其安全性高于传统护理预期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/3077fbbed920/12885_2014_4819_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/a7979e7b2da4/12885_2014_4819_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/6e3512a7b32d/12885_2014_4819_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/113f9ed4fcad/12885_2014_4819_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/49c49e08e498/12885_2014_4819_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/cbcb83463299/12885_2014_4819_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/204eb3a191a4/12885_2014_4819_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/d9f9f59623aa/12885_2014_4819_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/3077fbbed920/12885_2014_4819_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/a7979e7b2da4/12885_2014_4819_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/6e3512a7b32d/12885_2014_4819_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/113f9ed4fcad/12885_2014_4819_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/49c49e08e498/12885_2014_4819_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/cbcb83463299/12885_2014_4819_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/204eb3a191a4/12885_2014_4819_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/d9f9f59623aa/12885_2014_4819_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa67/4161840/3077fbbed920/12885_2014_4819_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fast-track surgery versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中快速康复外科与传统围手术期护理的Meta分析
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 23;14:607. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-607.
2
Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery.快速康复外科中腹腔镜与开放结直肠手术的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;31(3):613-22. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2493-2. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
3
Is the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Effective and Safe in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.加速康复外科(ERAS)方案在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中是否有效且安全?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1502-1512. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04170-8. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
4
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast-track perioperative care.快速康复围手术期护理下腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术的荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jul;55(7):821-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31824bd31e.
5
Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.加速康复外科方案对腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov 23;15(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1271-8.
6
Fast-track program vs traditional care in surgery for gastric cancer.胃癌手术中的快速康复计划与传统护理对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 14;20(2):578-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.578.
7
Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer.胃癌胃切除术快速康复外科疗效与安全性的Meta分析
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3142-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2690-0.
8
Enhanced Recovery Program in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Controlled Trial.腹腔镜结直肠手术中的加速康复方案:一项观察性对照试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):363-370. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0716. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
[Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer].[腹腔镜手术与开放手术用于IV期结直肠癌原发肿瘤姑息性切除的荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 25;23(6):589-596. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190619-00247.
10
[Systemic review of fast-track surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection].[腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者快速康复外科的系统评价]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;15(10):1048-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal trends in outpatient right colectomy: a contemporary multistate study.门诊右半结肠切除术的时间趋势:一项当代多州研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11888-x.
2
Impact of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols vs. traditional perioperative care on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.“加速康复外科”(ERAS)方案与传统围手术期护理对结直肠手术后患者结局的影响:一项系统评价
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Jan 16;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00425-9.
3
Management of Patients with Colorectal Cancer through Fast-Track Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy could improve postoperative recovery of low-risk rectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.快速康复外科联合腹腔镜手术可改善低危直肠癌患者术后恢复:一项随机对照临床试验
J Dig Dis. 2014 Jun;15(6):306-13. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12142.
2
Evaluation of novel local anesthetic wound infiltration techniques for postoperative pain following colorectal resection surgery: a meta-analysis.新型局部麻醉浸润技术在结直肠切除术后减轻术后疼痛的效果评价:一项荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):237-50. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000006.
3
Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis.
结直肠癌患者的快速通道手术管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;21(9):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091226.
4
Factors associated with postoperative discharge readiness and continuing care needs in patients with lung cancer undergoing fast-track surgery: A prospective cohort study.与快速通道手术后肺癌患者术后出院准备和持续护理需求相关的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e39314. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039314.
5
Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopy surgery versus conventional multi-port laparoscopy surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术与传统多孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr 29;39(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04630-x.
6
Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis.结直肠手术后非计划性再入院的发生率及危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0293806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293806. eCollection 2023.
7
Research trends in readiness for hospital discharge between 2002 and 2021: A bibliometric analysis.2002 年至 2021 年出院准备度研究趋势:文献计量分析。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7676-7693. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2009. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
8
Readmission prediction after colorectal cancer surgery: A derivation and validation study.结直肠癌手术后再入院预测:一项推导和验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287811. eCollection 2023.
9
Intra- and post-operative outcomes in benign gynaecologic surgeries before and after the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: A comparison.实施术后加速康复方案前后良性妇科手术的术中和术后结果:一项比较。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jan-Mar;19(1):112-119. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_42_22.
10
Effectiveness of intensive perioperative nutrition therapy among adults undergoing gastrointestinal and oncological surgery in a public hospital: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized control trial.在一家公立医院接受胃肠和肿瘤外科手术的成年人中强化围手术期营养治疗的效果:一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Nov 26;23(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06898-2.
快速康复与常规护理在腹腔镜结直肠恶性肿瘤切除中的应用比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9119-26. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9119.
4
A multicentre comparison of a fast track or conventional postoperative protocol following laparoscopic or open elective surgery for colorectal cancer surgery.腹腔镜或开放性择期结直肠癌手术快速康复或传统术后方案的多中心比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;16(2):134-40. doi: 10.1111/codi.12472.
5
Interpretation of meta-analyses of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery?腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术的荟萃分析解读?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Aug;56(8):e364-5. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318291885f.
6
Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery.现实生活中的快速康复外科:结直肠手术后患者因素如何影响结局及对强化康复临床路径的依从性
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):259-65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828ba16f.
7
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.术后恢复加速方案与传统护理在结直肠手术中的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):667-78. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182812842.
8
Effect of epidural analgesia on bowel function in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.硬膜外镇痛对腹腔镜结直肠手术肠功能的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2581-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2794-x. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
9
Implementation of fast-track protocols in open and laparoscopic sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter, comparative, prospective, non-randomized study.加速康复方案在开腹和腹腔镜保肛直肠癌手术中的应用:一项多中心、对照、前瞻性、非随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2012;29(4):301-9. doi: 10.1159/000342554. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术在加速康复方案下的免疫反应。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jul;16(7):1379-88. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1880-z. Epub 2012 May 15.