Suppr超能文献

为了更标准化和准确地评估食物的血糖反应:关于份量计算的建议。

Toward a more standardised and accurate evaluation of glycemic response to foods: recommendations for portion size calculation.

机构信息

PepsiCo, Inc., Global R&D - Technical Insights, 617 W Main Street, Barrington, IL 60010, United States.

PepsiCo, Inc., Global R&D - Technical Insights, 617 W Main Street, Barrington, IL 60010, United States.

出版信息

Food Chem. 2015 Jan 15;167:229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.124. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the adequacy of calculation methods for portions to be provided to subjects in clinical trials evaluating glycemic response to foods. Portion sizes were calculated for 140 food samples, based on Nutrition Facts labels (current practice) and actual available carbohydrate content (current recommendation), and compared against the amount of monosaccharides yielded by the digestive breakdown of their actual available carbohydrate content (basis for glycemic response to food). The current practice can result in significant under- or over-feeding of carbohydrates in 10% of tested cases, as compared to the targeted reference dosage. The method currently recommended can result in significantly inadequate yields of monosaccharides in 24% of tested cases. The current and recommended calculation methods do not seem adequate for a standardised evaluation of glycemic response to foods. It is thus recommended to account for the amount of absorbable monosaccharides of foods for portion size calculation.

摘要

本研究旨在评估用于评估食物血糖反应的临床试验中提供给受试者的部分计算方法的充分性。根据营养成分标签(现行做法)和实际可利用碳水化合物含量(现行建议),为 140 种食物样本计算了部分大小,并与通过其实际可利用碳水化合物含量的消化分解产生的单糖量进行了比较(食物血糖反应的基础)。与目标参考剂量相比,现行做法在 10%的测试情况下可能导致碳水化合物的明显不足或过量喂养。目前推荐的方法可能导致 24%的测试情况下单糖的产量明显不足。当前和推荐的计算方法似乎不足以对食物的血糖反应进行标准化评估。因此,建议在计算部分大小时考虑食物可吸收单糖的量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验