Kim Suezie, Blank Alan, Strauss Eric
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014;72(1):53-60.
AC (acromioclavicular) joint dislocations are a common injury seen by physicians. Symptoms range from minor discomfort with activity to complete disability of the extremity. Although most orthopaedic surgeons agree on how to treat either mild (type 1-2) or severe (type 4-6) injuries, there is no consensus for treatment of type 3 injuries. This article reviews the relevant literature pertaining to the anatomy of the injury, evaluation of the patient, pertinent imaging as well as the controversial management of type 3 AC joint dislocations. With improvement in surgical techniques over the past 30 years, there have been many published studies evaluating both operative and non-operative care. Surgery has shown dramatic improvement in patient-rated outcomes; however, it is not always without complications. These risks in some patients may not be worth the potential surgical benefits. In type 3 AC joint injuries each patient and pathology must be carefully analyzed to ensure that the correct treatment option is chosen.
肩锁关节脱位是医生常见的一种损伤。症状从活动时的轻微不适到肢体完全残疾不等。尽管大多数骨科医生对于如何治疗轻度(1 - 2型)或重度(4 - 6型)损伤意见一致,但对于3型损伤的治疗尚无共识。本文回顾了与该损伤的解剖结构、患者评估、相关影像学以及3型肩锁关节脱位的争议性处理相关的文献。在过去30年里,随着手术技术的改进,已有许多发表的研究评估了手术治疗和非手术治疗。手术已显示出患者评分结果有显著改善;然而,并非总是没有并发症。对某些患者来说,这些风险可能不值得潜在的手术益处。在3型肩锁关节损伤中,必须仔细分析每位患者和病理情况,以确保选择正确的治疗方案。