Kim Seong-Hun, Koh Kyoung-Hwan
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2018 Mar 1;21(1):48-55. doi: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.48. eCollection 2018 Mar.
While non-operative treatment with structured rehabilitation tends to be the strategy of choice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint injury, some advocate surgical treatment to prevent persistent pain, disability, and prominence of the distal clavicle. There is no clear consensus regarding when the surgical treatment should be indicated, and successful clinical outcomes have been reported for non-operative treatment in more than 80% of type III acromioclavicular joint injuries. Furthermore, there is no gold standard procedure for operative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury, and more than 60 different procedures have been used for this purpose in clinical practice. Among these surgical techniques, recently introduced arthroscopic-assisted procedures involving a coracoclavicular suspension device are minimally invasive and have been shown to achieve successful coracoclavicular reconstruction in 80% of patients with failed conservative treatment. Taken together, currently available data indicate that successful treatment can be expected with initial conservative treatment in more than 96% of type III acromioclavicular injuries, whereas minimally invasive surgical treatments can be considered for unstable type IIIB injuries, especially in young and active patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal treatment approach in patients with higher functional needs, especially in high-level athletes.
虽然结构化康复的非手术治疗往往是罗克伍德III型肩锁关节损伤治疗的首选策略,但一些人主张手术治疗以预防持续疼痛、功能障碍和锁骨远端突出。对于何时应进行手术治疗尚无明确共识,并且超过80%的III型肩锁关节损伤非手术治疗已报告有成功的临床结果。此外,III型肩锁关节损伤的手术治疗没有金标准术式,临床实践中为此目的已使用了60多种不同的术式。在这些手术技术中,最近引入的涉及喙锁悬吊装置的关节镜辅助手术是微创的,并且已证明在80%保守治疗失败的患者中能成功实现喙锁重建。综上所述,目前可得的数据表明,超过96%的III型肩锁损伤初始保守治疗有望成功,而对于不稳定的IIIB型损伤,尤其是年轻且活跃的患者,可考虑微创外科治疗。需要进一步研究以阐明功能需求较高的患者,特别是高水平运动员的最佳治疗方法。