Davies Michelle, Couper Keith, Bradley Julie, Baker Annalie, Husselbee Natalie, Woolley Sarah, Davies Robin P, Perkins Gavin D
Resuscitation Service, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Academic Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care, Pain and Resuscitation, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1523-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
Effective and safe cardiac arrest care in the hospital setting is reliant on the immediate availability of emergency equipment. The patient safety literature highlights deficiencies in current approaches to resuscitation equipment provision, highlighting the need for innovative solutions to this problem.
We conducted a before-after study at a large NHS trust to evaluate the effect of a sealed tray system and database on resuscitation equipment provision. The system was evaluated by a series of unannounced inspections to assess resuscitation trolley compliance with local policy prior to and following system implementation. The time taken to check trolleys was assessed by timing clinicians checking both types of trolley in a simulation setting.
The sealed tray system was implemented in 2010, and led to a significant increase in the number of resuscitation trolleys without missing, surplus, or expired items (2009: n=1 (4.76%) vs 2011: n=37 (100%), p<0.001). It also significantly reduced the time required to check each resuscitation trolley in the simulation setting (12.86 (95% CI: 10.02-15.71) vs 3.15 (95% CI: 1.19-4.51)min, p<0.001), but had no effect on the number of resuscitation trolleys checked every day over the previous month (2009: n=8 (38.10%) vs 2011: n=11 (29.73%), p=0.514).
The implementation of a sealed tray system led to a significant and sustained improvement in resuscitation equipment provision, but had no effect on resuscitation trolley checking frequency.
医院环境中有效且安全的心脏骤停护理依赖于应急设备的即时可用。患者安全文献强调了当前复苏设备供应方法存在的缺陷,突出了针对该问题创新解决方案的必要性。
我们在一家大型国民保健服务信托机构进行了一项前后对照研究,以评估密封托盘系统和数据库对复苏设备供应的影响。通过一系列不预先通知的检查来评估该系统,在系统实施前后评估复苏推车是否符合当地政策。在模拟环境中对检查推车的临床医生进行计时,以此评估检查推车所需的时间。
密封托盘系统于2010年实施,使得没有缺失、多余或过期物品的复苏推车数量显著增加(2009年:n = 1(4.76%) 对比2011年:n = 37(100%),p < 0.001)。它还显著减少了模拟环境中检查每个复苏推车所需的时间(12.86(95%可信区间:10.02 - 15.71)对比3.15(95%可信区间:1.19 - 4.51)分钟,p < 0.001),但对前一个月每天检查的复苏推车数量没有影响(2009年:n = 8(38.10%)对比2011年:n = 11(29.73%),p = 0.514)。
密封托盘系统的实施导致复苏设备供应有显著且持续的改善,但对复苏推车的检查频率没有影响。