Brenner B E, Kauffmann J
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA, USA.
Resuscitation. 1996 Feb;31(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(95)00905-1.
The outcome following a cardiac arrest is affected by the length of time that elapses before cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initiated. Only 10-15% of patients experiencing cardiac arrest in hospital settings survive to discharge. Therefore, the time between cardiac arrest and administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a metropolitan hospital was examined. All cardiac and respiratory arrests that occurred in the adult non-intensive care areas of a medical center over a period of 16 months were evaluated within 12 h to determine how much time had elapsed before resuscitation was initiated, the devices utilized for initial airway management, and the outcome. To initiate ventilation, bag-valve-masks (BVMs) were used in the majority (76%) of the efforts to resuscitate while mouth-to-mask resuscitation was performed in another 18%; however, in only 37% of the codes was ventilation initiated within 1 min and in 18% ventilation was started after 3 min. Mouth-to-mask resuscitation resulted in more rapid time to onset of ventilation than BVM. In only 18% of the arrests studied was a 'lay-on' mask available in the room and utilized. In 11%, a bag-valve-mask was at the patient's bedside, and in 53% a BVM was taken from the crash cart outside the room. In 63% of the cases where using a lay-on mask was appropriate, it was either not looked for or not present in the patient's room. Also in 37% of the cases where a BVM was needed, one was not readily present because of difficulty in locating the crash cart immediately. Although initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within a minute of a cardiac or respiratory arrest is the standard of care, in the non-intensive care in-patient cases surveyed, typically more than a minute elapsed, and frequently 3 or more minutes, before resuscitation was started. If the time elapsing before an arresting in-patient is ventilated can be shortened, which is easily and effectively achieved by mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-mask resuscitation, an increase in both the survival rate and the number of good neurological outcomes should be expected.
心脏骤停后的结果受开始心肺复苏前流逝时间的影响。在医院环境中发生心脏骤停的患者只有10% - 15%能存活至出院。因此,对一家大都市医院中心脏骤停与实施心肺复苏之间的时间进行了研究。对一家医疗中心成人非重症监护区域在16个月内发生的所有心脏和呼吸骤停事件在12小时内进行评估,以确定开始复苏前经过了多长时间、用于初始气道管理的设备以及结果。为开始通气,在大多数(76%)复苏努力中使用了袋阀面罩(BVM),另有18%进行了口对面罩复苏;然而,只有37%的急救在1分钟内开始通气,18%在3分钟后开始通气。口对面罩复苏比BVM导致通气开始的时间更快。在所研究的心脏骤停事件中,只有18%的房间里有“放置式”面罩并被使用。11%的情况下,袋阀面罩在患者床边,53%的情况下从房间外的急救推车上取用BVM。在63%适合使用放置式面罩的病例中,要么没有寻找,要么患者房间里没有。同样,在37%需要BVM的病例中,由于难以立即找到急救推车,BVM并不容易拿到。尽管在心脏或呼吸骤停后一分钟内开始心肺复苏是护理标准,但在所调查的非重症监护住院病例中,通常在开始复苏前经过了一分钟以上,而且经常是3分钟或更长时间。如果能缩短住院患者心脏骤停后通气前的时间,通过口对口或口对面罩复苏很容易且有效地就能做到这一点,那么预计存活率和良好神经功能结果的数量都会增加。