Suppr超能文献

庆大霉素给药剂量线图的预测性能。

Predictive performance of gentamicin dosing nomograms.

作者信息

Lee Jieon, Yoon Seonghae, Shin Donghoon, Han HyeKyung, An Hyungmi, Lee Jongtae, Lim Kyoung Soo, Yu Kyung-Sang, Lee Howard

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea ; Department of Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Aug 16;8:1097-106. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S66981. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several nomograms have been proposed to facilitate the determination of initial gentamicin dosing regimens in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess the predictive performance of these nomograms in Korean patients.

METHODS

Gentamicin concentrations were determined in 84 patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and in 95 patients with other infections. All patients underwent therapeutic drug monitoring in Seoul National University Hospital from 2006 to 2012. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a Bayesian method, which predicted steady state peak and trough serum concentrations. Six nomograms were evaluated in patients with "other" infections: the Thomson guidelines, Hull-Sarubbi table, and Rule of Eights, for multiple daily dosing; and the Hartford nomogram, Barnes-Jewish Hospital nomogram, and Sanford Guide, for extended-interval dosing. In IE patients, synergistic combination dosing nomograms, based on the American Heart Association dosing interval guidelines, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Gentamicin dosing nomograms performed poorly in attaining the target peak serum concentrations. Multiple-daily dosing nomograms predicted peak serum gentamicin concentrations better than did the extended-interval dosing nomograms (31.9%-72.3% vs 4.3%-45.7%, respectively). Similarly, in patients with IE, the once-daily dosing nomogram resulted in a significantly lower percentage of patients achieving target peak gentamicin concentrations than that associated with the thrice-daily dosing nomogram (P=0.0015). All of the multiple-daily dosing, extended-interval dosing, and synergistic combination dosing nomograms predicted the nontoxic target trough concentrations in >80% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Gentamicin dosing nomograms performed poorly in achieving the target peak serum concentrations. New gentamicin nomograms may be required in patients with IE, particularly for once-daily dosing. Therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended for gentamicin to ensure that the target concentrations are achieved.

摘要

背景

已经提出了几种列线图以方便在临床环境中确定庆大霉素初始给药方案。本研究旨在评估这些列线图在韩国患者中的预测性能。

方法

测定了84例感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者和95例其他感染患者的庆大霉素浓度。2006年至2012年期间,所有患者在首尔国立大学医院接受了治疗药物监测。使用贝叶斯方法估计个体药代动力学参数,该方法可预测稳态峰浓度和谷浓度。对“其他”感染患者评估了六种列线图:用于多次每日给药的汤姆森指南、赫尔-萨鲁比表和八分法;以及用于延长给药间隔的哈特福德列线图、巴恩斯-犹太医院列线图和桑福德指南。在IE患者中,评估了基于美国心脏协会给药间隔指南的协同联合给药列线图。

结果

庆大霉素给药列线图在达到目标峰浓度方面表现不佳。多次每日给药列线图预测的庆大霉素峰浓度优于延长给药间隔列线图(分别为31.9%-72.3%对4.3%-45.7%)。同样,在IE患者中,每日一次给药列线图导致达到目标庆大霉素峰浓度的患者百分比显著低于每日三次给药列线图(P=0.0015)。所有多次每日给药、延长给药间隔和协同联合给药列线图在>80%的患者中预测了无毒目标谷浓度。

结论

庆大霉素给药列线图在达到目标峰浓度方面表现不佳。IE患者可能需要新的庆大霉素列线图,特别是对于每日一次给药。强烈建议对庆大霉素进行治疗药物监测以确保达到目标浓度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验