文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

审稿人和编辑的公然不当行为:一个案例研究。

Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.

作者信息

Kotchoubey Boris, Bütof Sarah, Sitaram Ranganatha

机构信息

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Silcherstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany,

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9583-3. Epub 2014 Aug 26.


DOI:10.1007/s11948-014-9583-3
PMID:25156788
Abstract

A case of a particularly severe misbehavior in a review process is described. Two reviewers simply copied and pasted their critical comments from their previous reviews without reading the reviewed manuscript. The editor readily accepted the reviewers' opinion and rejected the manuscript. These facts give rise to some general questions about possible factors affecting the ethical behavior of reviewers and editors, as well as possible countermeasures to prevent ethical violations.

摘要

描述了评审过程中一起特别严重的不当行为案例。两名评审员只是从他们之前的评审中复制粘贴了他们的批判性评论,而没有阅读被评审的手稿。编辑轻易接受了评审员的意见并拒绝了该手稿。这些事实引发了一些关于影响评审员和编辑道德行为的可能因素以及防止道德违规的可能对策的一般性问题。

相似文献

[1]
Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015-8

[2]
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017-9-13

[3]
Elsevier investigates hundreds of peer reviewers for manipulating citations.

Nature. 2019-9

[4]
Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.

Nature. 2020-2

[5]
[Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].

Neurologia. 2010

[6]
Standards for ethical publication.

Am J Otolaryngol. 2007

[7]
A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017-8-15

[8]
[Some hints about the reviewers' ethical dilemmas].

Acta Med Croatica. 2008-12

[9]
Scientific misconduct - how does it affect you?

Spec Care Dentist. 2011

[10]
[Publication ethics--responsibility of all].

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010-2-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Publishing as an Indicator of Scientific Research Quality and Ethics: The Case of Law Journals from Moldova.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2020-4

[2]
Editorial Abuses.

J Korean Med Sci. 2017-12

[3]
Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Towards a more precise neurophysiological assessment of cognitive functions in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013

[2]
Conflict(s) of interest in peer review: its origins and possible solutions.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2014-3

[3]
A role for the default mode network in the bases of disorders of consciousness.

Ann Neurol. 2012-9

[4]
Brain connectivity in pathological and pharmacological coma.

Front Syst Neurosci. 2010-12-20

[5]
Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness.

Brain. 2009-9

[6]
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

J Med Ethics. 2009-6

[7]
Revelations from the unconscious: studying residual brain function in coma and related states.

Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 2008

[8]
Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2009-8

[9]
Intrinsic brain activity in altered states of consciousness: how conscious is the default mode of brain function?

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008

[10]
Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: an exploratory study.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2008-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索