• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出版伦理:复杂性科学与人为因素为建立公正文化提供见解

Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture.

作者信息

Saurin Tarcisio Abreu

机构信息

DEPROT/UFRGS (Industrial Engineering and Transportation Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul), Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5. andar, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-190, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1849-1854. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0
PMID:26608907
Abstract

While ethics in publishing has been increasingly debated, there seems to be a lack of a theoretical framework for making sense of existing rules of behavior as well as for designing, managing and enforcing such rules. This letter argues that systems-oriented disciplines, such as complexity science and human factors, offer insights into new ways of dealing with ethics in publishing. Some examples of insights are presented. Also, a call is made for empirical studies that unveil the context and details of both retracted papers and the process of writing and publishing academic papers. This is expected to shed light on the complexity of the publication system as well as to support the development of a just culture, in which all participants are accountable.

摘要

虽然出版伦理问题日益受到争议,但似乎缺乏一个理论框架来理解现有行为规则,以及设计、管理和执行这些规则。本文认为,诸如复杂性科学和人因学等面向系统的学科,为处理出版伦理问题提供了新的思路。文中给出了一些思路示例。此外,呼吁开展实证研究,揭示撤稿论文以及学术论文写作与发表过程的背景和细节。这有望阐明出版系统的复杂性,并支持发展一种公正文化,使所有参与者都能承担责任。

相似文献

1
Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture.出版伦理:复杂性科学与人为因素为建立公正文化提供见解
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1849-1854. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
2
Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study.笔名在(科学)出版界是否合乎道德规范?以“神经质疑者”为例。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1807-1810. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9825-7. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
3
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
4
Research integrity and publication ethics.研究诚信与出版伦理。
Atherosclerosis. 2010 Oct;212(2):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.050. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
5
Scientific integrity in Brazil.巴西的科研诚信。
J Bioeth Inq. 2014 Sep;11(3):283-7. doi: 10.1007/s11673-014-9539-y. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
6
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use.ChatGPT 之类的工具对科学的透明度构成威胁;以下是我们使用这些工具的基本规则。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):612. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1.
7
The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof.讽刺科学在寻找恶搞中的伦理问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1537-49. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9619-8. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
8
Ethics in science.科学中的伦理道德。
Oral Dis. 2007 Mar;13(2):125. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01367.x.
9
Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?当代科学中的先前发表与冗余:作者和编辑正处在十字路口吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1367-78. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9599-8. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
10
Ghostwriters in the fray: the implications for science, industry, medical journals, and our patients.卷入纷争的代笔作者:对科学、产业、医学期刊及我们患者的影响
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Nov;22(11):494-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000363462.31578.37.

引用本文的文献

1
Responses of Authors Accused of Plagiarism by Journal Editors.被期刊编辑指控抄袭的作者的回应。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):309-311. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9752-7. Epub 2016 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex socio-technical systems: Characterization and management guidelines.复杂的社会技术系统:特征与管理指南。
Appl Ergon. 2015 Sep;50:19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
2
Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?当代科学中的先前发表与冗余:作者和编辑正处在十字路口吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1367-78. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9599-8. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
3
Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.审稿人和编辑的公然不当行为:一个案例研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9583-3. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
4
Blind manuscript submission to reduce rejection bias?采用盲投方式以减少拒稿偏见?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9547-7. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
5
An author's guide to publication ethics: a review of emerging standards in biomedical journals.作者出版伦理指南:生物医学期刊新兴标准综述
Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):578-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01379.x.
6
Under-representation of developing countries in the research literature: ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals.发展中国家在研究文献中的呈现不足:对五家顶尖医学期刊调查引发的伦理问题
BMC Med Ethics. 2004 Oct 4;5:E5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-5-5.
7
Sociotechnical principles for system design.系统设计的社会技术原则。
Appl Ergon. 2000 Oct;31(5):463-77. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(00)00009-0.