文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

出版伦理:复杂性科学与人为因素为建立公正文化提供见解

Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture.

作者信息

Saurin Tarcisio Abreu

机构信息

DEPROT/UFRGS (Industrial Engineering and Transportation Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul), Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5. andar, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-190, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1849-1854. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0. Epub 2015 Nov 25.


DOI:10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0
PMID:26608907
Abstract

While ethics in publishing has been increasingly debated, there seems to be a lack of a theoretical framework for making sense of existing rules of behavior as well as for designing, managing and enforcing such rules. This letter argues that systems-oriented disciplines, such as complexity science and human factors, offer insights into new ways of dealing with ethics in publishing. Some examples of insights are presented. Also, a call is made for empirical studies that unveil the context and details of both retracted papers and the process of writing and publishing academic papers. This is expected to shed light on the complexity of the publication system as well as to support the development of a just culture, in which all participants are accountable.

摘要

虽然出版伦理问题日益受到争议,但似乎缺乏一个理论框架来理解现有行为规则,以及设计、管理和执行这些规则。本文认为,诸如复杂性科学和人因学等面向系统的学科,为处理出版伦理问题提供了新的思路。文中给出了一些思路示例。此外,呼吁开展实证研究,揭示撤稿论文以及学术论文写作与发表过程的背景和细节。这有望阐明出版系统的复杂性,并支持发展一种公正文化,使所有参与者都能承担责任。

相似文献

[1]
Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016-12

[2]
Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016-11-9

[3]
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.

Ann Ital Chir. 2016

[4]
Research integrity and publication ethics.

Atherosclerosis. 2010-2-18

[5]
Scientific integrity in Brazil.

J Bioeth Inq. 2014-9

[6]
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use.

Nature. 2023-1

[7]
The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015-12

[8]
Ethics in science.

Oral Dis. 2007-3

[9]
Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015-10

[10]
Ghostwriters in the fray: the implications for science, industry, medical journals, and our patients.

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Responses of Authors Accused of Plagiarism by Journal Editors.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Complex socio-technical systems: Characterization and management guidelines.

Appl Ergon. 2015-9

[2]
Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015-10

[3]
Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015-8

[4]
Blind manuscript submission to reduce rejection bias?

Sci Eng Ethics. 2015-4

[5]
An author's guide to publication ethics: a review of emerging standards in biomedical journals.

Headache. 2009-4

[6]
Under-representation of developing countries in the research literature: ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals.

BMC Med Ethics. 2004-10-4

[7]
Sociotechnical principles for system design.

Appl Ergon. 2000-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索