Patel Vishal, Wang Yongjun, MacDonald John K, McDonald John W D, Chande Nilesh
North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 26;2014(8):CD006884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006884.pub3.
BACKGROUND: Safe and effective long-term treatments that reduce the need for corticosteroids are needed for Crohn's disease. Although purine antimetabolites are moderately effective for maintenance of remission patients often relapse despite treatment with these agents. Methotrexate may provide a safe and effective alternative to more expensive maintenance treatment with TNF-α antagonists. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of randomized trials examining the efficacy and safety of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane IBD/FBD Group Specialized Trials Register were searched from inception to June 9, 2014. Study references and review papers were also searched for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared methotrexate to placebo or any other active intervention for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission as defined by the studies and expressed as a percentage of the total number of patients randomized (intention-to-treat analysis). We calculated the pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary outcome was assessed using the GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies (n = 333 patients) were included in the review. Three studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. Two studies were judged to be at high risk of bias due to blinding. Intramuscular methotrexate was superior to placebo for maintenance of remission at 40 weeks follow-up. Sixty-five per cent of patients in the intramuscular methotrexate group maintained remission compared to 39% of placebo patients (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.67; 76 patients).The number needed to treat to prevent one relapse was four. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of evidence supporting this outcome was moderate due to sparse data (40 events). There was no statistically significant difference in maintenance of remission at 36 weeks follow-up between oral methotrexate (12.5 mg/week) and placebo. Ninety per cent of patients in the oral methotrexate group maintained remission compared to 67% of placebo patients (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.67; 22 patients). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (17 events). A pooled analysis of two small studies (n = 50) showed no statistically significant difference in continued remission between oral methotrexate (12.5 mg to 15 mg/week) and 6-mercaptopurine (1 mg/kg/day) for maintenance of remission. Seventy-seven per cent of methotrexate patients maintained remission compared to 57% of 6-mercaptopurine patients (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.00). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to high risk of bias in one study (no blinding) and very sparse data (33 events). One small (13 patients) poor quality study found no difference in continued remission between methotrexate and 5-aminosalicylic acid (RR 2.62, 95% CI 0.23 to 29.79). A pooled analysis of two studies (n = 145) including one high quality trial (n = 126) found no statistically significant difference in maintenance of remission at 36 to 48 weeks between combination therapy (methotrexate and infliximab) and infliximab monotherapy. Fifty-four percent of patients in the combination therapy group maintained remission compared to 53% of monotherapy patients (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.38, P = 0.95). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of evidence supporting this outcome was low due to high risk of bias in one study (no blinding) and sparse data (78 events). Adverse events were generally mild in nature and resolved upon discontinuation or with folic acid supplementation. Common adverse events included nausea and vomiting, symptoms of a cold, abdominal pain, headache, joint pain or arthralgia, and fatigue. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate quality evidence indicates that intramuscular methotrexate at a dose of 15 mg/week is superior to placebo for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Intramuscular methotrexate appears to be safe. Low dose oral methotrexate (12.5 to 15 mg/week) does not appear to be effective for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Combination therapy (methotrexate and infliximab) does not appear to be any more effective for maintenance of remission than infliximab monotherapy. The results for efficacy outcomes between methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate and 5-aminosalicylic acid were uncertain. Large-scale studies of methotrexate given orally at higher doses for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease may provide stronger evidence for the use of methotrexate in this manner.
背景:克罗恩病需要安全有效的长期治疗,以减少对皮质类固醇的需求。尽管嘌呤抗代谢物对维持缓解有一定效果,但患者在接受这些药物治疗后仍常复发。甲氨蝶呤可能为使用更昂贵的肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂进行维持治疗提供一种安全有效的替代方案。本综述是对之前发表的Cochrane综述的更新。 目的:对随机试验进行系统评价,以研究甲氨蝶呤在克罗恩病维持缓解中的疗效和安全性。 检索方法:检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、PUBMED、EMBASE以及Cochrane炎症性肠病/功能性肠道疾病专业试验注册库,检索时间从建库至2014年6月9日。还检索了研究参考文献和综述论文以查找其他试验。 入选标准:将甲氨蝶呤与安慰剂或其他任何积极干预措施进行比较,用于克罗恩病维持缓解的随机对照试验(RCT)符合纳入标准。 数据收集与分析:两位作者独立审查研究的入选资格,提取数据并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。主要结局指标是维持临床缓解的患者比例,该比例由各研究定义,并表示为随机分组患者总数的百分比(意向性分析)。对于二分结局,我们计算了合并风险比(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)。使用GRADE标准评估支持主要结局的证据的总体质量。 主要结果:本综述纳入了5项研究(n = 333例患者)。3项研究被判定为低偏倚风险。2项研究因盲法问题被判定为高偏倚风险。在40周的随访中,肌内注射甲氨蝶呤在维持缓解方面优于安慰剂。肌内注射甲氨蝶呤组65%的患者维持缓解,而安慰剂组为39%(RR 1.67,95%CI 1.05至2.67;76例患者)。预防一次复发所需治疗的患者数为4例。GRADE分析表明,由于数据稀少(40例事件),支持该结局的证据总体质量为中等。在36周的随访中,口服甲氨蝶呤(12.5 mg/周)与安慰剂在维持缓解方面无统计学显著差异。口服甲氨蝶呤组90%的患者维持缓解,而安慰剂组为67%(RR 1.67,95%CI 1.05至2.67;22例患者)。GRADE分析表明,由于数据非常稀少(17例事件),支持该结局的证据总体质量为低。两项小型研究(n = 50)的汇总分析显示,口服甲氨蝶呤(12.5 mg至15 mg/周)与6-巯基嘌呤(1 mg/kg/天)在维持缓解方面无统计学显著差异。甲氨蝶呤组77%的患者维持缓解而6-巯基嘌呤组为57%(RR 1.36,95%CI 0.92至2.00)。GRADE分析表明,由于一项研究存在高偏倚风险(无盲法)且数据非常稀少(33例事件),支持该结局的证据总体质量非常低。一项小型(13例患者)低质量研究发现,甲氨蝶呤与5-氨基水杨酸在维持缓解方面无差异(RR 2.62,95%CI 0.23至29.79)。两项研究(n = 145)的汇总分析,其中包括一项高质量试验(n = 126),发现在36至48周时,联合治疗(甲氨蝶呤和英夫利昔单抗)与英夫利昔单抗单药治疗在维持缓解方面无统计学显著差异。联合治疗组54%的患者维持缓解,单药治疗组为53%(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.76至1.38,P = 0.95)。GRADE分析表明,由于一项研究存在高偏倚风险(无盲法)且数据稀少(78例事件),支持该结局的证据总体质量为低。不良事件一般性质较轻,停药或补充叶酸后可缓解。常见不良事件包括恶心、呕吐、感冒症状、腹痛、头痛、关节疼痛或关节痛以及疲劳。 作者结论:中等质量的证据表明,每周15 mg剂量的肌内注射甲氨蝶呤在克罗恩病维持缓解方面优于安慰剂。肌内注射甲氨蝶呤似乎是安全的。低剂量口服甲氨蝶呤(12.5至15 mg/周)在克罗恩病维持缓解方面似乎无效。联合治疗(甲氨蝶呤和英夫利昔单抗)在维持缓解方面似乎并不比英夫利昔单抗单药治疗更有效。甲氨蝶呤与6-巯基嘌呤以及甲氨蝶呤与5-氨基水杨酸之间疗效结局的结果尚不确定。关于高剂量口服甲氨蝶呤用于克罗恩病维持缓解的大规模研究可能会为以这种方式使用甲氨蝶呤提供更有力的证据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-8-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-8-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-8-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-8-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-8-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-8-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-7-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-26
Med Sci (Basel). 2025-1-29
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2024-10
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2025-5-1
World J Methodol. 2023-12-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-8-6
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012-11-28
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011-11-24
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011-1-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009-10-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009-1-21
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008-4