Prefontaine Eliza, Sutherland Lloyd R, Macdonald John K, Cepoiu Monica
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Health Sciences Centre, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD000067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000067.pub2.
The therapeutic role of 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine remains controversial due to their perceived relatively slow-acting effect and adverse effects. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of these agents for the maintenance of remission of quiescent Crohn's disease.
To assess the efficacy of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in quiescent Crohn's disease.
Pertinent studies were selected using the MEDLINE data base (1966-May 1998), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Inflammatory Bowel Disease register, as well as abstracts from major gastrointestinal research meetings and references from published articles and review. This search strategy was updated (1998-May 2008) using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane IBD/FBD group Specialized Trials Register.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of oral azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine involving adult patients (> 18 years) with quiescent Crohn's disease.
Data were extracted by three independent observers (EP, MC, LRS) based on the intention to treat principle. Peto odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for maintenance of remission, steroid sparing, and withdrawals due to adverse effects were calculated. Numbers needed to treat or harm (NNT, NNH respectively) for the maintenance of remission, steroid sparing, and withdrawals due to adverse effects were also determined.
Seven trials of azathioprine therapy and one of 6-mercaptopurine were included in the review. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine had a positive effect on maintaining remission. The Peto odds ratio (OR) for maintenance of remission with azathioprine was 2.32 (95% CI 1.55 to 3.49) with a NNT of 6. The Peto OR for maintenance of remission with 6-mercaptopurine was 3.32 (95% CI 1.40 to 7.87) with a of 4. Higher doses of azathioprine improved response. A steroid sparing effect with azathioprine was noted, with a Peto OR of 5.22 (95% CI 1.06 to 25.68) and NNT of 3 for quiescent disease. Withdrawals due to adverse events were more common in patients treated with azathioprine (Peto OR 3.74; 95% CI 1.48 to 9.45, NNH = 20) than with placebo.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Higher response rates were obtained with azathioprine than 6-mercaptopurine. However, the one study evaluating 6-mercaptopurine used a relatively low dose of the drug. Future studies should look at the effect of higher doses of 6-mercaptopurine. There is weak evidence for a steroid sparing effect with azathioprine treatment.
由于6-巯基嘌呤和硫唑嘌呤起效相对较慢且有不良反应,其治疗作用仍存在争议。进行了一项荟萃分析以评估这些药物在维持静止期克罗恩病缓解方面的疗效。
评估硫唑嘌呤和6-巯基嘌呤在维持静止期克罗恩病缓解方面的疗效。
使用MEDLINE数据库(1966年 - 1998年5月)、Cochrane对照试验注册库、炎症性肠病注册库,以及主要胃肠病研究会议的摘要、已发表文章的参考文献和综述来选择相关研究。使用MEDLINE、EMBASE和国际药学文摘数据库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库以及Cochrane IBD/FBD小组专门试验注册库对该检索策略进行了更新(1998年 - 2008年5月)。
涉及成年患者(>18岁)静止期克罗恩病的口服硫唑嘌呤或6-巯基嘌呤的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
由三名独立观察者(EP、MC、LRS)根据意向性治疗原则提取数据。计算维持缓解、节省类固醇以及因不良反应而停药的Peto比值比和95%置信区间。还确定了维持缓解、节省类固醇以及因不良反应而停药的治疗所需人数或伤害所需人数(分别为NNT、NNH)。
该综述纳入了7项硫唑嘌呤治疗试验和1项6-巯基嘌呤治疗试验。硫唑嘌呤和6-巯基嘌呤在维持缓解方面有积极作用。硫唑嘌呤维持缓解的Peto比值比(OR)为2.32(95%CI 1.55至3.49),NNT为6。6-巯基嘌呤维持缓解的Peto OR为3.32(95%CI 1.40至7.87),NNT为4。更高剂量的硫唑嘌呤可改善反应。注意到硫唑嘌呤有节省类固醇的作用,静止期疾病的Peto OR为5.22(95%CI 1.06至25.68),NNT为3。与安慰剂相比,接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者因不良事件停药更为常见(Peto OR 3.74;95%CI 1.48至9.45,NNH = 20)。
硫唑嘌呤和6-巯基嘌呤在维持克罗恩病缓解方面比安慰剂更有效。硫唑嘌呤的缓解率高于6-巯基嘌呤。然而,评估6-巯基嘌呤的一项研究使用的药物剂量相对较低。未来的研究应关注更高剂量6-巯基嘌呤的效果。有较弱的证据表明硫唑嘌呤治疗有节省类固醇的作用。