Ben-Yami Hanoch
a Department of Philosophy , Central European University , Budapest , Hungary.
Cogn Neurosci. 2014;5(3-4):217-8. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2014.951618. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
I agree with Nachev and Hacker's general approach. However, their criticism of claims of covert automaticity can be strengthened. I first say a few words on what voluntary action involves and on the consequent limited relevance of brain research for the determination of voluntariness. I then turn to Nachev and Hacker's discussion of possible covert automaticity and show why the case for it is weaker than they allow.
我赞同纳切夫和哈克的总体方法。然而,他们对隐蔽自动性主张的批评可以得到强化。我首先谈谈自愿行动涉及哪些方面,以及由此导致的大脑研究在确定自愿性方面的相关性有限。然后我转向纳切夫和哈克对可能的隐蔽自动性的讨论,并说明为何支持它的理由比他们所认为的更薄弱。