Fu Chih-Yuan, Wang Shang-Yu, Liao Chien-Hung, Kang Shih-Ching, Hsu Yu-Pao, Lin Being-Chuan, Yuan Kuo-Ching, Ouyang Chun-Hsiang
Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been applied in imaging studies for the assessment of most abdominal and pelvic injuries in some trauma centers. However, in most institutions, CTA is not routinely performed as part of the computed tomography scan protocol. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficiency of CTA in the evaluation of patients with pelvic fractures.
During the study period, patients with pelvic fracture were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to conventional computed tomography scanning that includes only the single venous phase, CTA with an additional arterial phase was used to obtain more information regarding vascular injuries. Further angiographic examination was performed in the patients with positive results in either the arterial or venous phase. The sensitivity and specificity of the multiphasic CTA images in the evaluation of active arterial hemorrhage were investigated. Furthermore, the results obtained for the arterial and venous phases were also combined to evaluate associated active arterial hemorrhage.
A total of 144 patients with pelvic fractures who underwent CTA were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 49 (34.0%) had active arterial hemorrhage. The sensitivities of the venous and arterial phase CTA images in the evaluation of active arterial hemorrhage were 100% (49/49) and 89.8% (44/49), respectively. Furthermore, all of the patients with positive results based on the arterial phase images were included in the group of patients with positive results based on the venous phase images. Although there were 4 patients without active arterial hemorrhage based on the angiographic examination, they still underwent embolization.
In the management of patients with pelvic fractures, CTA provides limited benefits in the evaluation of the active arterial hemorrhage. The additional arterial phase may be helpful for distinguishing between arterial and venous hemorrhage. However, this study showed that subsequent treatment was not changed.
在一些创伤中心,计算机断层血管造影(CTA)已应用于影像学研究,以评估大多数腹部和盆腔损伤。然而,在大多数机构中,CTA并非作为计算机断层扫描协议的一部分常规进行。在本研究中,我们旨在评估CTA在评估骨盆骨折患者中的效率。
在研究期间,对骨盆骨折患者进行回顾性分析。除了仅包括单静脉期的传统计算机断层扫描外,还使用了额外动脉期的CTA来获取更多关于血管损伤的信息。对动脉期或静脉期结果为阳性的患者进行进一步的血管造影检查。研究了多期CTA图像在评估活动性动脉出血中的敏感性和特异性。此外,还将动脉期和静脉期获得的结果相结合,以评估相关的活动性动脉出血。
本研究共纳入144例接受CTA检查的骨盆骨折患者。其中,49例(34.0%)有活动性动脉出血。静脉期和动脉期CTA图像在评估活动性动脉出血中的敏感性分别为100%(49/49)和89.8%(44/49)。此外,所有基于动脉期图像结果为阳性的患者都包括在基于静脉期图像结果为阳性的患者组中。尽管血管造影检查显示有4例患者无活动性动脉出血,但他们仍接受了栓塞治疗。
在骨盆骨折患者的治疗中,CTA在评估活动性动脉出血方面的益处有限。额外的动脉期可能有助于区分动脉出血和静脉出血。然而,本研究表明后续治疗并未改变。