Louw Louise, Steyl Johan, Loggenberg Eugene
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014 Jul 31;4:40. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.137833. eCollection 2014.
Identification of the origin of the central retinal artery (CRA) is imperative in tailoring angiographic studies to resolve a given clinical problem. A case with dual ophthalmic arteries (OAs), characterized by different origins and distinct branching patterns, is documented for training purposes. Pre-clinical diagnosis of a 9-year-old child who presented with a sharp wire in the left-side eyeball was primarily corneal laceration. For imaging, a selected six-vessel angiographic study with the transfemoral approach was performed. Embolization was not required and the wire could be successfully removed. Right-side OA anatomy was normal, while left-side dual OAs with external carotid artery (ECA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) origins were seen. The case presented with a left-side meningo-ophthalmic artery (M-OA) anomaly via the ECA, marked by a middle meningeal artery (MMA) (origin: Maxillary artery; course: Through foramen spinosum) with normal branches (i.e. anterior and posterior branches), and an OA variant (course: Through superior orbital fissure) with a distinct orbital branching pattern. A smaller OA (origin: ICA; course: Through optic foramen) with a distinct ocular branching pattern presented with the central retinal artery (CRA). The presence of the dual OAs and the M-OA anomaly can be explained by disturbed evolutionary changes of the primitive OA and stapedial artery during development. The surgical interventionist must be aware of dual OAs and M-OA anomalies with branching pattern variations on retinal supply, because of dangerous extracranial-intracranial anastomotic connections. It is of clinical significance that the origin of the CRA from the ICA or ECA must be determined to avoid complications to the vision.
确定视网膜中央动脉(CRA)的起源对于定制血管造影研究以解决特定临床问题至关重要。记录了一例具有不同起源和独特分支模式的双眼动脉(OA)病例,用于培训目的。一名9岁儿童因左侧眼球有尖锐金属丝就诊,临床初步诊断主要为角膜裂伤。为进行成像,采用经股动脉途径进行了选定的六血管血管造影研究。无需栓塞,金属丝得以成功取出。右侧OA解剖结构正常,而左侧可见双OA,其起源分别为颈外动脉(ECA)和颈内动脉(ICA)。该病例显示左侧通过ECA出现脑膜眼动脉(M - OA)异常,其特征为脑膜中动脉(MMA)(起源:上颌动脉;走行:通过棘孔)分支正常(即前支和后支),以及一个走行不同(通过眶上裂)且具有独特眼眶分支模式的OA变异。一条较小的OA(起源:ICA;走行:通过视神经管)具有独特的眼部分支模式,并伴有视网膜中央动脉(CRA)。双OA和M - OA异常的存在可由发育过程中原发性OA和镫骨动脉的进化变化紊乱来解释。由于存在危险的颅外 - 颅内吻合连接,手术干预者必须了解双OA和M - OA异常及其在视网膜供血方面的分支模式变化。确定CRA起源于ICA还是ECA具有临床意义,可避免对视功能造成并发症。