Ammann Bernadette C, Knols Ruud H, Baschung Pierrette, de Bie Rob A, de Bruin Eling D
Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6200 MD, the Netherlands.
BMC Neurol. 2014 Aug 22;14:167. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0167-2.
There is increasing evidence for the beneficial effects of exercise training in stroke survivors. In order to reach the desired training effects, exercise training principles must be considered as this ensures the prescription of adequate exercises at an adequate dose. Moreover, exercise training interventions must be designed in a way that maximizes patients' adherence to the prescribed exercise regimen. The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to investigate whether training principles for physical exercise interventions are reported in RCTs for sub-acute and chronic stroke survivors, (2) to evaluate whether the RCTs reported the prescription of the FITT components of the exercise interventions as well as (3) patients' adherence to this prescription, and (4) to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.
We performed a systematic review of RCTs with exercise training as the primary intervention and muscular strength and/or endurance as primary outcomes. The Cochrane library's risk of bias (ROB) tool was used to judge the methodological quality of RCTs.
Thirty-seven RCTs were included in this systematic review. Eighteen studies (48.7%) focused on aerobic, 8 (21.6%) on resistance and 11 (29.7%) on combined interventions of aerobic and resistive strength exercise. Twenty-nine studies (78.4%) included only chronic stroke survivors, 5 studies (13.5%) only sub-acute stroke survivors whilst 3 studies (8.1%) included both. In terms of principle of exercise training, 89% reported specificity, 75.7% progression, 48.7% overload, 37.8% initial values, 32.4% reversibility and 13.5% diminishing returns. One RCT described all principles of physical exercise training and 19 (51.4%) all FITT components. Patients' adherence to exercise prescription was accounted for in 3 studies (8.1%). Failure to report blinding in patients and participants and failure to report allocation concealment were the most prevalent methodological shortcomings.
Incomplete and inconsistent reporting of (1) training components, (2) underlying exercise training principles and (3) patient adherence together with (4) a broad variation in the methodological quality of the included RCTs limit both the utility and reproducibility of physical exercise programs in stroke patients.
越来越多的证据表明运动训练对中风幸存者有有益影响。为了达到预期的训练效果,必须考虑运动训练原则,因为这能确保以适当的剂量开出适当的运动处方。此外,运动训练干预措施的设计必须能最大限度地提高患者对规定运动方案的依从性。本系统评价的目的是:(1)调查随机对照试验(RCT)中是否报告了针对亚急性和慢性中风幸存者的体育锻炼干预的训练原则;(2)评估随机对照试验是否报告了运动干预的FITT要素的处方;(3)以及患者对该处方的依从性;(4)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
我们对以运动训练为主要干预措施、以肌肉力量和/或耐力为主要结局的随机对照试验进行了系统评价。使用Cochrane图书馆的偏倚风险(ROB)工具来判断随机对照试验的方法学质量。
本系统评价纳入了37项随机对照试验。18项研究(48.7%)侧重于有氧运动,8项(21.6%)侧重于阻力运动,11项(29.7%)侧重于有氧运动和阻力运动的联合干预。29项研究(78.4%)仅纳入慢性中风幸存者,5项研究(13.5%)仅纳入亚急性中风幸存者,3项研究(8.1%)同时纳入两者。在运动训练原则方面,89%的研究报告了特异性,75.7%报告了渐进性,48.7%报告了超负荷,37.8%报告了初始值,32.4%报告了可逆性,13.5%报告了收益递减。1项随机对照试验描述了体育锻炼训练的所有原则,19项(51.4%)描述了所有FITT要素。3项研究(8.1%)报告了患者对运动处方的依从性。未报告对患者和参与者的盲法以及未报告分配隐藏是最常见的方法学缺陷。
(1)训练要素、(2)基础运动训练原则、(3)患者依从性的报告不完整且不一致,以及(4)纳入的随机对照试验的方法学质量差异很大,这些都限制了中风患者体育锻炼计划的实用性和可重复性。