Why not big ideas and big interventions?
作者信息
Brook Robert H
机构信息
The RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA,
出版信息
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1586-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3003-x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why not big ideas and big interventions?为什么不提出宏大的想法并采取大规模的干预措施呢？
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1586-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3003-x.
2
Experiments and demonstrations in health services research.卫生服务研究中的实验与示范
Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):677-95. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198505000-00027.
3
Efficacy, effectiveness, variations, and quality. Boundary-crossing research.疗效、有效性、变异性与质量。跨领域研究。
Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):710-22. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198505000-00030.
4
Taking the mystery out of "mystery shopper" studies.揭开“神秘顾客”研究的神秘面纱。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):484-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1107779. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5
Using subjective health assessments in practice and policy-making.在实践和政策制定中使用主观健康评估。
Health Care Anal. 1996 Nov;4(4):284-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02249315.
6
Measuring the effectiveness of medical interventions: new expectations of health services research.衡量医学干预措施的效果：对卫生服务研究的新期望。
Health Serv Res. 1990 Dec;25(5):691-5.
7
How Qualitative Research Informs Clinical and Policy Decision Making in Transplantation: A Review.定性研究如何为移植领域的临床和政策决策提供信息：综述
Transplantation. 2016 Sep;100(9):1997-2005. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001358.
8
Choosing an appropriate unit of analysis in trials of interventions that attempt to influence practice.在试图影响实践的干预试验中选择合适的分析单位。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):44-8. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400111.
9
Disentangling secular trends and policy impacts in health studies: use of interrupted time series analysis.解析健康研究中的长期趋势和政策影响：中断时间序列分析的应用
J R Soc Med. 2013 Apr;106(4):124-9. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.110319.
10
The Value of Qualitative Description in Health Services and Policy Research.定性描述在卫生服务与政策研究中的价值
Healthc Policy. 2017 Feb;12(3):12-18.
本文引用的文献
1
The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.主要绩效薪酬对患者结局的长期影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1606-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1112351. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Tool used to assess how well community health centers function as medical homes may be flawed.用于评估社区健康中心作为医疗之家运作情况的工具可能存在缺陷。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):627-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0908. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials.护理协调对医疗保险受益人的住院治疗、医疗质量和医疗保健支出的影响：15项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):603-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.126.
4
Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature.卫生信息技术的成本与效益：文献中的新趋势。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w282-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w282. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
5
Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.免费医疗能改善成年人的健康状况吗？一项随机对照试验的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Dec 8;309(23):1426-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198312083092305.
Zotero 插件