Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步治疗在收缩性心力衰竭且 QRS 间期≤130ms 患者中的应用:一项荟萃分析的观点。

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure and QRS interval ≤130 ms: insights from a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital, Gateway Building, 3rdFl, PO Box 980053, Richmond, VA 23298-0053, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):267-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu214. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

Abstract

AIMS

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic systolic heart failure (SHF) and a wide QRS complex. It is unclear whether the same benefit extends to patients with QRS duration (QRSd) <130 ms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trial (RCTs) and to evaluate the effect of implantable CRT defibrillator(CRTD) on all-cause mortality, HF mortality, and HF hospitalization in patients with QRSd <130 ms. We performed a systematic literature search to identify all RCTs, comparing CRTD therapy with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with SHF (ejection fraction <35%) and QRS ≤130 ms, published in Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Google scholar from June 1980 through June 2013. The search terms included CRT, QRS duration, narrow QRS, clinical trial, RCT, biventricular pacing, heart failure, systolic dysfunction, dyssynchrony, left ventricular remodelling, readmission, mortality, survival, and various combinations of these terms. We studied the trends of overall mortality, SHF mortality, and hospitalizations due to SHF between the two groups. Heterogeneity of the studies was analysed by Q statistic. A fixed-effect model was used to compute the relative risk (RR) of mortality due to SHF, while a random-effects model was used to compare hospitalization due to SHF. Out of a total of 12 100 citations, four RCTs comparing CRTD vs. ICD therapy in patients with SHF and QRS ≤130 ms fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 12 months and the cumulative number of patients was 1177. Relative Risk for all-cause mortality in patients treated with CRTD was 1.66 with a 95% CI of 1.096-2.515 (P = 0.017) while for SHF mortality was 1.29 with 95% CI of 0.68-2.45 (P = 0.42). Relative risk for HF hospitalization in patients treated with CRTD was 0.94 with 95% CI of 0.50-1.74 (P = 0.84) in comparison to the ICD group.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy defibrillator has no impact on SHF mortality and SHF hospitalization in patients with systolic HF with QRS duration ≤130 ms and is associated with higher all-cause mortality in comparison with ICD therapy.

摘要

目的

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可降低慢性收缩性心力衰竭(SHF)和宽 QRS 波群患者的发病率和死亡率。目前尚不清楚 QRS 持续时间(QRSd)<130ms 的患者是否同样受益。

方法和结果

我们的目的是对所有随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,并评估植入式 CRT 除颤器(CRTD)对 QRSd<130ms 的患者全因死亡率、HF 死亡率和 HF 住院率的影响。我们进行了系统的文献检索,以确定 1980 年 6 月至 2013 年 6 月期间在 Pubmed、Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google 学术期刊上发表的所有比较 SHF(射血分数<35%)和 QRS≤130ms 的患者的 CRTD 治疗与植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)治疗的 RCT,使用的搜索词包括 CRT、QRS 持续时间、窄 QRS、临床试验、RCT、双心室起搏、心力衰竭、收缩功能障碍、不同步、左心室重塑、再入院、死亡率、生存率以及这些术语的各种组合。我们研究了两组之间全因死亡率、SHF 死亡率和因 SHF 住院的趋势。使用 Q 统计量分析研究的异质性。使用固定效应模型计算因 SHF 导致的死亡率的相对风险(RR),而使用随机效应模型比较因 SHF 导致的住院率。在总共 12100 个引文,四项 RCT 比较 CRTD 与 ICD 治疗 SHF 和 QRS≤130ms 的患者符合纳入标准。中位随访时间为 12 个月,累积患者数为 1177 例。接受 CRTD 治疗的患者全因死亡率的相对风险为 1.66,95%置信区间为 1.096-2.515(P=0.017),而因 SHF 导致的死亡率为 1.29,95%置信区间为 0.68-2.45(P=0.42)。与 ICD 组相比,接受 CRTD 治疗的患者因 HF 住院的相对风险为 0.94,95%置信区间为 0.50-1.74(P=0.84)。

结论

在 QRS 持续时间≤130ms 的收缩性 HF 患者中,心脏再同步治疗除颤器对 SHF 死亡率和 SHF 住院率没有影响,与 ICD 治疗相比,其全因死亡率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验