Suppr超能文献

无左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者中QRS时限与心脏再同步治疗临床获益的关系:心脏再同步治疗多中心自动除颤器植入试验子研究

Relation of QRS Duration to Clinical Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients Without Left Bundle Branch Block: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Substudy.

作者信息

Biton Yitschak, Kutyifa Valentina, Cygankiewicz Iwona, Goldenberg Ilan, Klein Helmut, McNitt Scott, Polonsky Bronislava, Ruwald Anne Christine, Ruwald Martin H, Moss Arthur J, Zareba Wojciech

机构信息

From the Heart Research Follow-up Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine at the University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (Y.B., V.K., I.C., I.G., H.K., S.M., B.P., A.C.R., M.H.R., A.J.M., W.Z.); Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (A.C.R., M.H.R.); and Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.B., I.G.).

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002667.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data regarding the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and without left bundle branch block.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes of 537 non-left bundle branch block patients with mild HF enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) study by QRS duration or morphology further stratified by PR interval. At 7 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of HF hospitalization or death was 45% versus 56% among patients randomized to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D), respectively (P=0.209). Multivariable-adjusted subgroup analysis by QRS duration showed that patients from the lower quartile QRS duration group (≤ 134 ms) experienced 2.4-fold (P=0.015) increased risk for HF hospitalization or death with CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator only therapy, whereas the effect of CRT-D in patients from the upper quartiles group (QRS>134 ms) was neutral (hazard ratio [HR] =0.97, P=0.86; P value for interaction =0.024). In a second analysis incorporating PR interval, patients with prolonged QRS (>134 ms) and prolonged PR (>230 ms) were protected with CRT-D (HR=0.31, P=0.003), whereas the association was neutral with prolonged QRS (>134 ms) and shorter PR (≤ 230 ms;, HR=1.19, P=0.386; P value for interaction =0.002). The effect was neutral, regardless of morphology, right bundle branch block (HR=1.01, P=0.975), and intraventricular conduction delay (HR=1.31, P=0.172).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patients with mild HF but without left bundle branch block morphology did not derive clinical benefit with CRT-D during long-term follow-up. Relatively shorter QRS was associated with a significantly increased risk with CRT-D relative to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator -only.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00180271, NCT01294449, and NCT02060110.

摘要

背景

关于心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对心力衰竭(HF)且无左束支传导阻滞患者的疗效,存在相互矛盾的数据。

方法与结果

我们通过QRS波时限或形态,并根据PR间期进一步分层,评估了纳入多中心自动除颤器植入试验(MADIT-CRT)研究的537例轻度HF非左束支传导阻滞患者的长期临床结局。在7年的随访中,随机接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和带除颤功能的CRT(CRT-D)治疗的患者中,HF住院或死亡的累积概率分别为45%和56%(P = 0.209)。按QRS波时限进行多变量校正的亚组分析显示,QRS波时限处于下四分位数组(≤134毫秒)的患者接受CRT-D治疗时,HF住院或死亡风险比仅接受ICD治疗增加2.4倍(P = 0.015),而QRS波时限处于上四分位数组(QRS>134毫秒)的患者中,CRT-D的效果呈中性(风险比[HR]=0.97,P = 0.8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验