Biton Yitschak, Kutyifa Valentina, Cygankiewicz Iwona, Goldenberg Ilan, Klein Helmut, McNitt Scott, Polonsky Bronislava, Ruwald Anne Christine, Ruwald Martin H, Moss Arthur J, Zareba Wojciech
From the Heart Research Follow-up Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine at the University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (Y.B., V.K., I.C., I.G., H.K., S.M., B.P., A.C.R., M.H.R., A.J.M., W.Z.); Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (A.C.R., M.H.R.); and Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.B., I.G.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002667.
There are conflicting data regarding the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and without left bundle branch block.
We evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes of 537 non-left bundle branch block patients with mild HF enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) study by QRS duration or morphology further stratified by PR interval. At 7 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of HF hospitalization or death was 45% versus 56% among patients randomized to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D), respectively (P=0.209). Multivariable-adjusted subgroup analysis by QRS duration showed that patients from the lower quartile QRS duration group (≤ 134 ms) experienced 2.4-fold (P=0.015) increased risk for HF hospitalization or death with CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator only therapy, whereas the effect of CRT-D in patients from the upper quartiles group (QRS>134 ms) was neutral (hazard ratio [HR] =0.97, P=0.86; P value for interaction =0.024). In a second analysis incorporating PR interval, patients with prolonged QRS (>134 ms) and prolonged PR (>230 ms) were protected with CRT-D (HR=0.31, P=0.003), whereas the association was neutral with prolonged QRS (>134 ms) and shorter PR (≤ 230 ms;, HR=1.19, P=0.386; P value for interaction =0.002). The effect was neutral, regardless of morphology, right bundle branch block (HR=1.01, P=0.975), and intraventricular conduction delay (HR=1.31, P=0.172).
Overall, patients with mild HF but without left bundle branch block morphology did not derive clinical benefit with CRT-D during long-term follow-up. Relatively shorter QRS was associated with a significantly increased risk with CRT-D relative to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator -only.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00180271, NCT01294449, and NCT02060110.
关于心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对心力衰竭(HF)且无左束支传导阻滞患者的疗效,存在相互矛盾的数据。
我们通过QRS波时限或形态,并根据PR间期进一步分层,评估了纳入多中心自动除颤器植入试验(MADIT-CRT)研究的537例轻度HF非左束支传导阻滞患者的长期临床结局。在7年的随访中,随机接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和带除颤功能的CRT(CRT-D)治疗的患者中,HF住院或死亡的累积概率分别为45%和56%(P = 0.209)。按QRS波时限进行多变量校正的亚组分析显示,QRS波时限处于下四分位数组(≤134毫秒)的患者接受CRT-D治疗时,HF住院或死亡风险比仅接受ICD治疗增加2.4倍(P = 0.015),而QRS波时限处于上四分位数组(QRS>134毫秒)的患者中,CRT-D的效果呈中性(风险比[HR]=0.97,P = 0.8