Bechtel William
Department of Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Programs in Cognitive Science and Science Studies, University of California, San Diego.
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;1(3):548-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01039.x.
Philosophy of science is positioned to make distinctive contributions to cognitive science by providing perspective on its conceptual foundations and by advancing normative recommendations. The philosophy of science I embrace is naturalistic in that it is grounded in the study of actual science. Focusing on explanation, I describe the recent development of a mechanistic philosophy of science from which I draw three normative consequences for cognitive science. First, insofar as cognitive mechanisms are information-processing mechanisms, cognitive science needs an account of how the representations invoked in cognitive mechanisms carry information about contents, and I suggest that control theory offers the needed perspective on the relation of representations to contents. Second, I argue that cognitive science requires, but is still in search of, a catalog of cognitive operations that researchers can draw upon in explaining cognitive mechanisms. Last, I provide a new perspective on the relation of cognitive science to brain sciences, one which embraces both reductive research on neural components that figure in cognitive mechanisms and a concern with recomposing higher-level mechanisms from their components and situating them in their environments.
科学哲学能够通过提供对认知科学概念基础的视角以及推进规范性建议,为认知科学做出独特贡献。我所秉持的科学哲学是自然主义的,因为它基于对实际科学的研究。聚焦于解释,我描述了一种机械主义科学哲学的近期发展,并从中得出对认知科学的三个规范性结论。首先,就认知机制是信息处理机制而言,认知科学需要说明认知机制中所调用的表征如何承载有关内容的信息,我认为控制理论为表征与内容的关系提供了所需的视角。其次,我认为认知科学需要一份认知操作目录,但仍在探寻之中,研究人员在解释认知机制时可以借鉴这份目录。最后,我为认知科学与脑科学的关系提供了一个新视角,该视角既包含对构成认知机制的神经成分的还原研究,也关注从其组成部分重新构建高级机制并将它们置于其环境之中。