Jacob Pierre
Institut Jean Nicod, UMR 8129, EHESS/ENS/CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;1(3):570-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01040.x.
Mirror neurons fire both when a primate executes a transitive action directed toward a target (e.g., grasping) and when he observes the same action performed by another. According to the prevalent interpretation, action-mirroring is a process of interpersonal neural similarity whereby an observer maps the agent's perceived movements onto her own motor repertoire. Furthermore, ever since Gallese and Goldman's (1998) influential paper, action-mirroring has been linked to third-person mindreading on the grounds that it enables an observer to represent the agent's intention. In this paper, I criticize the prevalent interpretation on two grounds. First, action-mirroring could not result in interpersonal neural similarity unless there was a single mechanism active at different times in a single brain during the execution and the perception of acts of grasping. Second, such a neural mechanism is better conceived as underlying the possession of the concept of grasping than as a basis for mindreading.
当灵长类动物执行针对目标的传递性动作(例如抓握)时,以及当它观察到另一个体执行相同动作时,镜像神经元都会放电。根据普遍的解释,动作镜像乃是人际神经相似性的一个过程,借此观察者将所感知到的施动者的动作映射到自身的运动技能库中。此外,自加莱塞和戈德曼(1998年)那篇有影响力的论文发表以来,动作镜像就一直与第三人称心理解读联系在一起,理由是它能使观察者表征施动者的意图。在本文中,我基于两点理由批评这种普遍的解释。其一,除非在执行和感知抓握动作期间,有单一机制在单个大脑的不同时刻处于活跃状态,否则动作镜像不可能导致人际神经相似性。其二,这样一种神经机制更应被视为理解抓握概念的基础,而非心理解读的基础。