Torricelli Fabio C M, De Shubha, Gebreselassie Surafel, Li Ina, Sarkissian Carl, Monga Manoj
Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Nephrology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Nephrology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Urology. 2014 Sep;84(3):544-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.074.
To evaluate the impact of diabetic medications and glycemic control on the urine pH, 24-hour urine stone risk profile, and stone composition.
We retrospectively reviewed our database searching for type-2 diabetic patients with kidney stones from July 2002 to January 2013. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to their diabetic medications: insulin vs oral antihyperglycemics. Patients were compared based on their urine collections and stone composition. A linear regression was done to assess which variables could predict a low urine pH. In a subgroup analysis, patients on thiazolidinediones (ie, pioglitazone) were compared with patients on other oral antihyperglycemics.
We analyzed 1831 type-2 diabetic patients with stone disease; 375 (20.5%) were included in the insulin group and 1456 (79.5%) in the antihyperglycemics group. Linear regression revealed male gender (P = .011) and insulin therapy (P <.001) as protective factors of low urine pH, whereas HbA1c level (P <.001) was inversely related to the urine pH (odds ratio, -0.066; 95% confidence interval, -0.096 to -0.036; P <.001). There were no significant differences in other 24-h urine stone risk parameters or stone composition between the groups. There were also no significant differences in the subgroup analysis.
Urine pH is inversely related to HbA1c level. Insulin therapy is associated with higher urine pH than oral antihyperglycemic agents despite higher HbA1c suggesting that insulin may modify urine pH independent of glycemic control.
评估糖尿病药物及血糖控制对尿液pH值、24小时尿结石风险谱及结石成分的影响。
我们回顾性分析了2002年7月至2013年1月期间患有肾结石的2型糖尿病患者的数据库。根据糖尿病用药情况将患者分为两组:胰岛素组与口服降糖药组。根据尿液收集情况及结石成分对患者进行比较。进行线性回归分析以评估哪些变量可预测低尿液pH值。在亚组分析中,将使用噻唑烷二酮类药物(即吡格列酮)的患者与使用其他口服降糖药的患者进行比较。
我们分析了1831例患有结石疾病的2型糖尿病患者;胰岛素组纳入375例(20.5%),降糖药组纳入1456例(79.5%)。线性回归分析显示,男性(P = 0.011)和胰岛素治疗(P < 0.001)是低尿液pH值的保护因素,而糖化血红蛋白水平(P < 0.001)与尿液pH值呈负相关(比值比,-0.066;95%置信区间,-0.096至-0.036;P < 0.001)。两组之间在其他24小时尿结石风险参数或结石成分方面无显著差异。亚组分析中也无显著差异。
尿液pH值与糖化血红蛋白水平呈负相关。尽管糖化血红蛋白水平较高,但胰岛素治疗与比口服降糖药更高的尿液pH值相关,这表明胰岛素可能独立于血糖控制来改变尿液pH值。