• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌风险评估分析,用于预测外照射放疗或前列腺粒子近距离放疗后的生化复发。

Analysis of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment to predict for biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy or prostate seed brachytherapy.

作者信息

Delouya Guila, Krishnan Vimal, Bahary Jean-Paul, Larrivée Sandra, Taussky Daniel

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Center Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada; University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Center Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Urology. 2014 Sep;84(3):629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.032.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.032
PMID:25168545
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the value of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to predict biochemical failure (bF) in patients with D'Amico low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with different radiation techniques.

METHODS

We analyzed 744 patients treated with either external beam radiotherapy (52.7%) or permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy (47.3%) without any androgen deprivation. External beam radiotherapy dose levels were extreme hypofractionation (45 Gy in 9 fractions) in 10%, 76-79.2 Gy (in 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) in 32.7%, and 70.2-74 Gy in 10%. All patients had a minimum of 36-month follow-up. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to predict for bF, as per the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen-nadir + 2 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for patients without bF was 56 months (range, 36-114 months). In univariate analysis, CAPRA score as a continuous variable was predictive of bF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.79; P <.001), and in multivariate analysis adjusted for treatment type, the HR was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.14-1.71; P = .002). D'Amico intermediate-risk vs low-risk patients had an HR for bF of 1.93 (95% CI, 1.07-3.47; P = .029) in univariate analysis, but the difference was not statistically significant anymore after adjustment for treatment type, (P = .206). The area under the curve of the CAPRA score as a continuous variable at 3 and 5 years was 0.66 and 0.62, respectively (P = .005 for both years).

CONCLUSION

The CAPRA score is predictive of bF. Each 1-point rise increased the risk of bF by 39%, which is comparable to surgical series.

摘要

目的

分析前列腺癌风险评估(CAPRA)评分对接受不同放疗技术治疗的达米科低危或中危前列腺癌患者生化复发(bF)的预测价值。

方法

我们分析了744例接受外照射放疗(52.7%)或永久性前列腺近距离放疗(47.3%)且未接受任何雄激素剥夺治疗的患者。外照射放疗剂量水平分别为:10%的患者采用超分割放疗(9次分割,共45 Gy),32.7%的患者接受76 - 79.2 Gy(每次分割1.8 - 2.0 Gy),10%的患者接受70.2 - 74 Gy。所有患者至少随访36个月。按照Phoenix定义(前列腺特异性抗原最低点 + 2 ng/mL),采用Cox回归分析进行单因素和多因素分析以预测bF。

结果

无bF患者的中位随访时间为56个月(范围36 - 114个月)。在单因素分析中,CAPRA评分作为连续变量可预测bF(风险比[HR],1.49;95%置信区间[CI],1.23 - 1.79;P <.001),在多因素分析中,校正治疗类型后,HR为1.39(95% CI,1.14 - 1.71;P =.002)。在单因素分析中,达米科中危与低危患者bF的HR为1.93(95% CI,1.07 - 3.47;P =.029),但校正治疗类型后差异不再具有统计学意义(P =.206)。CAPRA评分作为连续变量在第3年和第5年的曲线下面积分别为0.66和0.62(两年P值均为.005)。

结论

CAPRA评分可预测bF。评分每升高1分,bF风险增加39%,这与手术系列研究结果相当。

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment to predict for biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy or prostate seed brachytherapy.前列腺癌风险评估分析,用于预测外照射放疗或前列腺粒子近距离放疗后的生化复发。
Urology. 2014 Sep;84(3):629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.032.
2
The Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score predicts biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose escalation or low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy.前列腺癌风险评估 (CAPRA) 评分可预测接受外照射放疗 (EBRT) 剂量递增或低剂量率 (LDR) 近距离放疗的中危前列腺癌的生化复发。
BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6):865-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.12587. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
3
Unification of a common biochemical failure definition for prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation.针对接受近距离放射治疗或外照射放疗(无论是否联合雄激素剥夺治疗)的前列腺癌,统一常见生化失败定义。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Dec 1;66(5):1430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.024. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
4
Long term results of a prospective dose escalation phase-II trial: interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy as boost for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.前瞻性剂量递增 II 期试验的长期结果:间质脉冲剂量率近距离放疗作为中高危前列腺癌的增敏剂。
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Aug;104(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
5
The addition of low-dose-rate brachytherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy decreases biochemical failure and prostate cancer death compared with dose-escalated external-beam radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer.对于高危前列腺癌,与调强适形外照射放疗相比,低剂量率近距离放疗联合雄激素剥夺治疗可降低生化失败和前列腺癌死亡的风险。
Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;119(3):681-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27784. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
6
Comparison of external beam radiotherapy versus permanent seed brachytherapy as monotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer - a single center Canadian experience.外照射放疗与永久性粒子植入近距离放疗作为中度风险前列腺癌单一疗法的比较——加拿大单中心经验
Can J Urol. 2017 Jun;24(3):8822-8826.
7
Excellent results from high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam for prostate cancer are not improved by androgen deprivation.高剂量率近距离放射疗法和外照射治疗前列腺癌的卓越疗效不会因雄激素剥夺而得到改善。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug;32(4):342-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31818cd277.
8
Lack of benefit from a short course of androgen deprivation for unfavorable prostate cancer patients treated with an accelerated hypofractionated regime.对于接受加速分割放疗方案治疗的预后不良前列腺癌患者,短期雄激素剥夺治疗并无益处。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1322-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.053.
9
Risk profiles to predict PSA relapse-free survival for patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy.预测接受永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗患者无前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)复发存活情况的风险模型。
Cancer J Sci Am. 1999 Sep-Oct;5(5):301-6.
10
A comparison of early prostate-specific antigen decline between prostate brachytherapy and different fractionation of external beam radiation-Impact on biochemical failure.前列腺近距离放射治疗与不同分割方式的外照射放疗早期前列腺特异性抗原下降情况比较——对生化复发的影响
Brachytherapy. 2018 Mar-Apr;17(2):277-282. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.11.014. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: assessment of prognostic factors on pretreatment imaging.使用多参数磁共振成像和光谱法预测放射治疗后前列腺癌复发:评估治疗前成像的预后因素
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Dec;12(12):5309-5325. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-184.
2
The CAPRA score versus sub-types of minimal residual disease to predict biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy.用于预测外照射放疗后生化复发的CAPRA评分与微小残留病亚型的关系
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 May 12;14:1042. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1042. eCollection 2020.
3
The Within-Group Discrimination Ability of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score for Men with Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.
前列腺癌风险评估评分对中危前列腺癌男性的组内歧视能力。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jan 29;33(5):e36. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e36.
4
Clinical risk-stratification for prostate cancer: Where are we, and where do we need to go?前列腺癌的临床风险分层:我们现在处于什么位置,以及我们需要走向何方?
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Mar-Apr;11(3-4):101-102. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4520.
5
External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer.ProCaRS列线图的外部验证及局限性前列腺癌现有风险分层工具的比较
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Mar-Apr;11(3-4):94-100. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4084.
6
An appraisal of analytical tools used in predicting clinical outcomes following radiation therapy treatment of men with prostate cancer: a systematic review.评估用于预测前列腺癌男性患者放射治疗后临床结果的分析工具:一项系统综述。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0786-z.