Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
Department of Urology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jan 29;33(5):e36. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e36.
Significant clinical heterogeneity within contemporary risk group is well known, particularly for those with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPCa). Our study aimed to analyze the ability of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to discern between favorable and non-favorable risk in patients with IRPCa.
We retrospectively reviewed the data of 203 IRPCa patients who underwent extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed by a single surgeon. Pathologic favorable IRPCa was defined as a Gleason score ≤ 6 and organ-confined stage at surgical pathology. The CAPRA score was compared with two established criteria for the within-group discrimination ability.
Overall, 38 patients (18.7% of the IRPCa cohort) had favorable pathologic features after RARP. The CAPRA score significantly correlated with established criteria I and II and was inversely associated with favorable pathology (all P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the discriminative ability between favorable and non-favorable pathology was 0.679 for the CAPRA score and 0.610 and 0.661 for established criteria I and II, respectively. During a median 37.8 (interquartile range, 24.6-60.2) months of follow-up, 66 patients (32.5%) experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR). Cox regression analysis revealed that the CAPRA score, as a continuous sum score model or 3-group risk model, was an independent predictor of BCR after RARP.
The within-group discrimination ability of preoperative CAPRA score might help in patient counseling and selecting optimal treatments for those with IRPCa.
当代风险组内存在显著的临床异质性,这在中间风险前列腺癌(IRPCa)患者中尤为明显。我们的研究旨在分析前列腺癌风险评估(CAPRA)评分在区分 IRPCa 患者中有利和不利风险方面的能力。
我们回顾性分析了 203 例接受单外科医生行腹膜外机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的 IRPCa 患者的数据。病理上有利的 IRPCa 定义为 Gleason 评分≤6 且手术病理分期为器官局限。CAPRA 评分与两种已建立的分组内区分能力标准进行了比较。
总体而言,38 例患者(IRPCa 队列的 18.7%)在 RARP 后具有有利的病理特征。CAPRA 评分与已建立的标准 I 和 II 显著相关,且与有利的病理呈负相关(均 P<0.001)。CAPRA 评分区分有利和不利病理的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.679,而已建立的标准 I 和 II 的面积分别为 0.610 和 0.661。在中位 37.8 个月(四分位距,24.6-60.2)的随访期间,66 例患者(32.5%)发生生化复发(BCR)。Cox 回归分析显示,CAPRA 评分作为连续总和评分模型或 3 组风险模型,是 RARP 后 BCR 的独立预测因素。
术前 CAPRA 评分的分组内区分能力可能有助于对 IRPCa 患者进行患者咨询和选择最佳治疗方案。