Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌风险评估评分对中危前列腺癌男性的组内歧视能力。

The Within-Group Discrimination Ability of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score for Men with Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.

Department of Urology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jan 29;33(5):e36. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e36.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant clinical heterogeneity within contemporary risk group is well known, particularly for those with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPCa). Our study aimed to analyze the ability of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to discern between favorable and non-favorable risk in patients with IRPCa.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 203 IRPCa patients who underwent extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed by a single surgeon. Pathologic favorable IRPCa was defined as a Gleason score ≤ 6 and organ-confined stage at surgical pathology. The CAPRA score was compared with two established criteria for the within-group discrimination ability.

RESULTS

Overall, 38 patients (18.7% of the IRPCa cohort) had favorable pathologic features after RARP. The CAPRA score significantly correlated with established criteria I and II and was inversely associated with favorable pathology (all P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the discriminative ability between favorable and non-favorable pathology was 0.679 for the CAPRA score and 0.610 and 0.661 for established criteria I and II, respectively. During a median 37.8 (interquartile range, 24.6-60.2) months of follow-up, 66 patients (32.5%) experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR). Cox regression analysis revealed that the CAPRA score, as a continuous sum score model or 3-group risk model, was an independent predictor of BCR after RARP.

CONCLUSION

The within-group discrimination ability of preoperative CAPRA score might help in patient counseling and selecting optimal treatments for those with IRPCa.

摘要

背景

当代风险组内存在显著的临床异质性,这在中间风险前列腺癌(IRPCa)患者中尤为明显。我们的研究旨在分析前列腺癌风险评估(CAPRA)评分在区分 IRPCa 患者中有利和不利风险方面的能力。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 203 例接受单外科医生行腹膜外机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的 IRPCa 患者的数据。病理上有利的 IRPCa 定义为 Gleason 评分≤6 且手术病理分期为器官局限。CAPRA 评分与两种已建立的分组内区分能力标准进行了比较。

结果

总体而言,38 例患者(IRPCa 队列的 18.7%)在 RARP 后具有有利的病理特征。CAPRA 评分与已建立的标准 I 和 II 显著相关,且与有利的病理呈负相关(均 P<0.001)。CAPRA 评分区分有利和不利病理的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.679,而已建立的标准 I 和 II 的面积分别为 0.610 和 0.661。在中位 37.8 个月(四分位距,24.6-60.2)的随访期间,66 例患者(32.5%)发生生化复发(BCR)。Cox 回归分析显示,CAPRA 评分作为连续总和评分模型或 3 组风险模型,是 RARP 后 BCR 的独立预测因素。

结论

术前 CAPRA 评分的分组内区分能力可能有助于对 IRPCa 患者进行患者咨询和选择最佳治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d886/5773849/6d1686ad5093/jkms-33-e36-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验