Rolle Guido, Tremolizzo Lucio, Somalvico Francesco, Ferrarese Carlo, Bressan Livio C
From the Italian School of Osteopathy and Manual Therapies (SIOTEMA) in Sartirana (Dr Rolle); the Neurology Unit at the University of Milano-Bicocca in Monza (Drs Tremolizzo and Ferrarese); Alpha Search in Milan (Mr Somalvico); and Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento in Milan (Dr Bressan), Italy
From the Italian School of Osteopathy and Manual Therapies (SIOTEMA) in Sartirana (Dr Rolle); the Neurology Unit at the University of Milano-Bicocca in Monza (Drs Tremolizzo and Ferrarese); Alpha Search in Milan (Mr Somalvico); and Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento in Milan (Dr Bressan), Italy.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Sep;114(9):678-85. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.136.
Osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMTh; manipulative care provided by foreign-trained osteopaths) may be used for managing headache pain and related disability, but there is a need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to assess the effectiveness of this intervention.
To explore the efficacy of OMTh for pain management in frequent episodic tension-type headache (TTH).
Single-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study.
Patients were recruited from 5 primary care settings.
Forty-four patients who were affected by frequent episodic TTH and not taking any drugs for prophylactic management of episodic TTH were recruited.
Patients were randomly allocated to an experimental or control group. The experimental group received corrective OMTh techniques, tailored for each patient; the control group received assessment of the cranial rhythmic impulse (sham therapy). The study included a 1-month baseline period, a 1-month treatment period, and a 3-month follow-up period.
The primary outcome was the change in patient-reported headache frequency, and secondary outcomes included changes in headache pain intensity (discrete score, 1 [lowest perceived pain] to 5 [worst perceived pain]), over-the-counter medication use, and Headache Disability Inventory score.
Forty patients completed the study (OMTh, n=21; control, n=19). The OMTh group had a significant reduction in headache frequency over time that persisted 1 month (approximate reduction, 40%; P<.001) and 3 months (approximate reduction, 50%; P<.001) after the end of treatment. Moreover, there was an absolute difference between the 2 treatment groups at the end of the study, with a 33% lower frequency of headache in the OMTh group (P<.001).
This feasibility study demonstrated the efficacy of OMTh in the management of frequent episodic TTH, compared with sham therapy in a control group. Osteopathic manipulative therapy may be preferred over other treatment modalities and may benefit patients who have adverse effects to medications or who have difficulty complying with pharmacologic regimens. This protocol may serve as a model for future studies.
整骨手法治疗(OMTh;由外国培训的整骨医生提供的手法治疗)可用于管理头痛疼痛及相关残疾,但需要高质量的随机对照试验来评估这种干预措施的有效性。
探讨整骨手法治疗对频繁发作性紧张型头痛(TTH)疼痛管理的疗效。
单盲随机安慰剂对照试验性研究。
从5个初级保健机构招募患者。
招募了44名受频繁发作性TTH影响且未服用任何药物进行发作性TTH预防性管理的患者。
患者被随机分配到实验组或对照组。实验组接受针对每位患者量身定制的矫正性整骨手法技术;对照组接受颅节律性冲动评估(假治疗)。该研究包括1个月的基线期、1个月的治疗期和3个月的随访期。
主要结局是患者报告的头痛频率变化,次要结局包括头痛疼痛强度变化(离散评分,1[最低感知疼痛]至5[最严重感知疼痛])、非处方药物使用情况以及头痛残疾量表评分。
40名患者完成了研究(整骨手法治疗组,n = 21;对照组,n = 19)。整骨手法治疗组随着时间推移头痛频率显著降低,在治疗结束后1个月(约降低40%;P <.001)和3个月(约降低50%;P <.001)仍持续。此外,在研究结束时,两个治疗组之间存在绝对差异,整骨手法治疗组的头痛频率低33%(P <.001)。
这项可行性研究表明,与对照组的假治疗相比,整骨手法治疗在管理频繁发作性TTH方面具有疗效。整骨手法治疗可能比其他治疗方式更受青睐,可能使对药物有不良反应或难以遵守药物治疗方案的患者受益。该方案可作为未来研究的模型。