Montserrat Sílvia, Gabrielli Luigi, Bijnens Bart, Borràs Roger, Berruezo Antonio, Poyatos Sílvia, Brugada Josep, Mont Lluis, Sitges Marta
Cardiology Department, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic; IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Comisión Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia FONDAP.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jan;12(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
Predictors of second radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) success are not well known. Surgical ablation is accepted for failed first RFCA, but second RFCA has fewer complications.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate left atrial (LA) size and function as potential predictors of second RFCA for atrial fibrillation (AF).
Thirty-three healthy volunteers (group I) and 83 patients with symptomatic drug-refractory AF treated with a first RFCA (group II, n = 48) or a second RFCA (group III, n = 35 patients) were included. Echocardiography was performed in all patients in sinus rhythm before RFCA and in all volunteers. LA size and function were measured using longitudinal strain and strain rate during ventricular systole (LASs, LASRs) and during early diastole (LASRe) or late diastole (LASRa) with speckle tracking echocardiography. The effectiveness of RFCA on arrhythmia recurrence was evaluated at 6-month follow-up.
LASs, LASRs, and LASRa were significantly lower in group III patients compared to other groups (P < .001 for all). LA diameter or volumes did not predict success after RFCA. LASs was an independent predictor of arrhythmia suppression after a first RFCA and after a second RFCA, with the best cutoff at LASs >20% (sensitivity 86%, specificity 70%) and LASs >12% (sensitivity 84%, specificity 90%), respectively.
LA myocardial deformation imaging is a reliable tool for predicting success after a first and a second RFCA. These parameters could improve candidate selection, especially for a second RFCA.
第二次射频导管消融(RFCA)成功的预测因素尚不清楚。首次RFCA失败后可接受外科消融,但第二次RFCA并发症较少。
本研究旨在评估左心房(LA)大小和功能作为心房颤动(AF)第二次RFCA潜在预测因素的情况。
纳入33名健康志愿者(I组)和83例有症状的药物难治性AF患者,其中48例接受首次RFCA(II组),35例接受第二次RFCA(III组)。在RFCA前对所有处于窦性心律的患者及所有志愿者进行超声心动图检查。使用斑点追踪超声心动图在心室收缩期(LASs、LASRs)、舒张早期(LASRe)或舒张晚期(LASRa)测量LA大小和功能,采用纵向应变和应变率。在6个月随访时评估RFCA对心律失常复发的有效性。
与其他组相比,III组患者的LASs、LASRs和LASRa显著更低(所有P <.001)。LA直径或容积不能预测RFCA后的成功情况。LASs是首次RFCA和第二次RFCA后心律失常抑制的独立预测因素,最佳截断值分别为LASs >20%(敏感性86%,特异性70%)和LASs >12%(敏感性84%,特异性90%)。
LA心肌变形成像对于预测首次和第二次RFCA后的成功是一种可靠工具。这些参数可改善候选者的选择,尤其是对于第二次RFCA。