• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择用于评估的技术。

Selecting technologies for assessment.

作者信息

Eddy D M

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):485-501. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008424.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462300008424
PMID:2517499
Abstract

This article describes criteria used by several organizations to select technologies for assessment and the factors that are common to most lists of criteria. It presents a framework or model (called TAPSS) that relates the most important factors. The model can be used to estimate the expected impact of an assessment on health and economic outcomes for a population. It incorporates information on such factors as the health and economic importance of the disease addressed by the technology, the expected impact of the technology on health and economic outcomes, variations in the technology's current use, and factors affecting the production and reception of an assessment. The article includes an example of an application of the method--screening for maple syrup urine disease.

摘要

本文介绍了多个组织用于选择技术进行评估的标准以及大多数标准清单中常见的因素。它提出了一个关联最重要因素的框架或模型(称为TAPSS)。该模型可用于估计评估对人群健康和经济结果的预期影响。它纳入了诸如该技术所针对疾病的健康和经济重要性、该技术对健康和经济结果的预期影响、该技术当前使用情况的变化以及影响评估产生和接受的因素等信息。本文还包括该方法应用的一个例子——枫糖尿症筛查。

相似文献

1
Selecting technologies for assessment.选择用于评估的技术。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):485-501. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008424.
2
Pitfalls of newborn screening (with special attention to hypothyroidism): when will we ever learn?新生儿筛查的陷阱(特别关注甲状腺功能减退症):我们何时才能吸取教训?
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1983;19(5):111-20.
3
Current status of economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community: report of the network. The EC Network on the Methodology of Economic Appraisal of Health Technology.欧洲共同体卫生技术经济评估的现状:网络报告。欧洲共同体卫生技术经济评估方法网络
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jun;38(12):1601-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90060-4.
4
Why Do Health Economists Promote Technology Adoption Rather Than the Search for Efficiency? A Proposal for a Change in Our Approach to Economic Evaluation in Health Care.为什么卫生经济学家提倡采用技术而非追求效率?关于改变我们在医疗保健经济评估方法的提议。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Feb;37(2):139-147. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16653397. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
5
Technology framework. A system's five-phase approach integrates values with vision.
Health Prog. 1993 Jan-Feb;74(1):58-62.
6
Technology assessment. Old, new, and needs-based.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Fall;11(4):650-62. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009089.
7
Researcher-driven versus policy-driven economic appraisal of health technologies: the case of France.研究者驱动与政策驱动的卫生技术经济评估:以法国为例。
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jun;38(12):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90063-9.
8
Technology's implications for health care quality. A clinical engineering perspective.技术对医疗质量的影响。临床工程视角。
Nurs Adm Q. 2003 Oct-Dec;27(4):307-17. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200310000-00008.
9
Technology assessment for radiologists.放射科医生的技术评估
Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):309-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302031277.
10
How health economic evaluation (HEE) contributes to decision-making in public health care: the case of Brazil.健康经济评估如何助力公共卫生保健决策:以巴西为例
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection and Prioritization of Medical Devices for HTA Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Existing Approaches.用于卫生技术评估的医疗设备的选择与优先级确定:对现有方法的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00981-w.
2
Organising Research and Development for evidence-informed health care: some universal characteristics and a case study from the UK.组织循证卫生保健的研究与开发:一些普遍特征及来自英国的案例研究。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Oct;16(4):489-504. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000074. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
3
Prioritisation criteria for the selection of new diagnostic technologies for evaluation.
优先选择用于评估的新诊断技术的标准。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 5;10:109. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-109.
4
On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.论成为一名优秀倾听者:为应用健康服务研究设定优先事项。
Milbank Q. 2003;81(3):363-88. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060.
5
Keeping pace with new technologies: systems needed to identify and evaluate them.跟上新技术的步伐:识别和评估新技术所需的系统。
BMJ. 1999 Nov 13;319(7220):1291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1291.
6
Setting priorities and selecting topics for clinical practice guidelines.确定临床实践指南的优先级并选择主题。
CMAJ. 1995 Nov 1;153(9):1233-7.
7
Computer Rx: more harm than good?
J Med Syst. 1991 Dec;15(5-6):321-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00995971.
8
STA distinguished lecture. Can technology education during medical school make better doctors?
J Clin Monit. 1992 Jul;8(3):243-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01616784.