Ng E H, Lim-Tan S K, Nambiar R
Singapore Med J. 1989 Dec;30(6):557-60.
This paper assesses the cost effectiveness of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as a selection criteria for surgery in solitary thyroid nodules compared to scintigraphy and ultrasonography. 98 patients who had FNAC and histological confirmation, scintigraphy and/or ultrasonography were studied. The use of combined diagnostic discriminants of positive FNAC, clinical suspicion and age above 50 years detected all malignancies and would have resulted in fewer patients being subjected to surgery--51% (FNAC) vs 90% (Scans, U/S). This resulted in cost savings of $800 per patient seen. We conclude therefore that FNAC should be the diagnostic modality of choice and that the routine use of scintigraphy and ultrasonography is not justifiable.
本文评估了细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)作为孤立性甲状腺结节手术选择标准相对于闪烁扫描和超声检查的成本效益。对98例接受了FNAC、组织学确诊、闪烁扫描和/或超声检查的患者进行了研究。采用FNAC阳性、临床怀疑和年龄超过50岁的联合诊断判别方法可检测出所有恶性肿瘤,且接受手术的患者会减少——51%(FNAC)对90%(扫描、超声)。这使得每位就诊患者节省了800美元的费用。因此,我们得出结论,FNAC应成为首选的诊断方式,常规使用闪烁扫描和超声检查是不合理的。