Price Katy
Queen Mary University, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Dec;48 Pt A:103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
Using letters sent to British playwright J. B. Priestley in 1963, this paper explores the intersection between patient-focused history of psychiatry and the history of parapsychology in everyday life. Priestley's study of precognition lay outside the main currents of parapsychology, and his status as a storyteller encouraged confidences about anomalous temporal experience and mental illness. Drawing on virtue epistemology, I explore the regulation of subjectivity operated by Priestley in establishing the credibility of his correspondents in relation to their gender and mental health, and investigate the possibility of testimonial justice for these witnesses. Priestley's ambivalent approach to madness in relation to visions of the future is related to the longer history of prophecy and madness. Letters from the television audience reveal a variety of attitudes towards the compatibility of precognition with modern theories of the mind, show the flexibility of precognition in relation to mental distress, and record a range of responses from medical and therapeutic practitioners. Testimonial justice for those whose experience of precognition intersects with psychiatric care entails a full acknowledgement of the tensions and complicities between these two domains as they are experienced by the witness, and an explicit statement of the hearer's orientation to those domains.
本文利用1963年寄给英国剧作家J. B. 普利斯特利的信件,探讨了以患者为中心的精神病学史与日常生活中特异心理学史的交叉点。普利斯特利对预知的研究处于特异心理学的主流之外,而他作为一名讲故事者的身份促使人们吐露关于异常时间体验和精神疾病的秘密。借鉴德性认识论,我探讨了普利斯特利在确立其通信者在性别和心理健康方面的可信度时所实施的主体性调节,并研究了为这些证人实现证言公正的可能性。普利斯特利在对待与未来幻象相关的疯狂问题上的矛盾态度,与预言和疯狂的悠久历史有关。电视观众的来信揭示了对预知与现代心理理论兼容性的各种态度,展示了预知在与精神痛苦相关方面的灵活性,并记录了医学和治疗从业者的一系列反应。对于那些预知体验与精神科护理相交的人来说,证言公正需要充分承认证人所经历的这两个领域之间的紧张关系和共谋关系,并明确陈述听者对这些领域的取向。