Knape Nina, Mayer Herbert, Schnepp Wilfried, zu Sayn-Wittgenstein Friederike
Department of Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Faculty of Health, Stockumer Str,12, D-58453 Witten, Germany.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Sep 2;14:300. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-300.
The continuous rise in caesarean rates across most European countries raises multiple concerns. One factor in this development might be the type of care women receive during childbirth. 'Supportive care during labour' by midwives could be an important factor for reducing fear, tension and pain and decreasing caesarean rates. The presence and availability of midwives to support a woman in line with her needs are central aspects for 'supportive care during labour'.To date, there is no existing research on the influence of effective 'supportive care' by German midwives on the mode of birth. This study examines the association between the attendance and workload of midwives with the mode of birth outcomes in a population of low-risk women in a German multicentre sample.
The data are based on a prospective controlled multicentre trial (n = 1,238) in which the intervention 'midwife-led care' was introduced. Four German hospitals participated between 2007 and 2009.Secondary analyses included a convenience sample of 999 low-risk women from the primary analyses who met the selection criterion 'low-risk status'. Participation was voluntary. The association between the mode of birth and the key variables 'attendance of midwives' and 'workload of midwives' was assessed using backward logistic regression models.
The overall rate of spontaneous delivery was 80.7% (n = 763). The 'attendance of midwives' and the 'workload of midwives' did not exhibit a significant association with the mode of birth. However, women who were not satisfied with the presence of midwives (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.54-3.95) or who did not receive supportive procedures by midwives (OR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.50-6.05) were significantly more likely to experience operative delivery or a caesarean. Further explanatory variables include the type of hospital, participation in childbirth preparation class, length of stay from admission to birth, oxytocin usage and parity.
Satisfaction with the presence of and supportive procedures by midwives are associated with the mode of birth. The presence and behaviour of midwives should suit the woman's expectations and fulfil her needs. For reasons of causality, we would recommend experimental or quasi-experimental research that would exceed the explorative character of this study.
大多数欧洲国家剖宫产率持续上升引发了诸多担忧。这一发展趋势的一个因素可能是女性在分娩期间接受的护理类型。助产士提供的“分娩期间的支持性护理”可能是减少恐惧、紧张和疼痛以及降低剖宫产率的重要因素。助产士根据女性需求提供支持的在场情况和可及性是“分娩期间的支持性护理”的核心方面。迄今为止,尚无关于德国助产士有效的“支持性护理”对分娩方式影响的现有研究。本研究在德国多中心样本中的低风险女性群体中,考察助产士的在场情况和工作量与分娩结局方式之间的关联。
数据基于一项前瞻性对照多中心试验(n = 1238),其中引入了“助产士主导的护理”干预措施。2007年至2009年期间,四家德国医院参与了该试验。二次分析纳入了来自初步分析的999名符合“低风险状态”选择标准的低风险女性的便利样本。参与是自愿的。使用向后逻辑回归模型评估分娩方式与关键变量“助产士的在场情况”和“助产士的工作量”之间的关联。
自然分娩的总体发生率为80.7%(n = 763)。“助产士的在场情况”和“助产士的工作量”与分娩方式未呈现显著关联。然而,对助产士在场情况不满意的女性(比值比:2.45,95%置信区间1.54 - 3.95)或未接受助产士支持性程序的女性(比值比:3.01,95%置信区间1.50 - 6.05)更有可能经历手术分娩或剖宫产。进一步的解释变量包括医院类型、参加分娩准备课程情况、入院至分娩的住院时间、催产素使用情况和产次。
对助产士在场情况和支持性程序的满意度与分娩方式相关。助产士的在场情况和行为应符合女性的期望并满足其需求。出于因果关系的原因,我们建议开展超越本研究探索性质的实验性或准实验性研究。