Suppr超能文献

助产士的出勤率和工作量与分娩方式之间的关联:德国医疗保健系统中的二次分析

The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system.

作者信息

Knape Nina, Mayer Herbert, Schnepp Wilfried, zu Sayn-Wittgenstein Friederike

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, University of Witten/Herdecke, Faculty of Health, Stockumer Str,12, D-58453 Witten, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Sep 2;14:300. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-300.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The continuous rise in caesarean rates across most European countries raises multiple concerns. One factor in this development might be the type of care women receive during childbirth. 'Supportive care during labour' by midwives could be an important factor for reducing fear, tension and pain and decreasing caesarean rates. The presence and availability of midwives to support a woman in line with her needs are central aspects for 'supportive care during labour'.To date, there is no existing research on the influence of effective 'supportive care' by German midwives on the mode of birth. This study examines the association between the attendance and workload of midwives with the mode of birth outcomes in a population of low-risk women in a German multicentre sample.

METHODS

The data are based on a prospective controlled multicentre trial (n = 1,238) in which the intervention 'midwife-led care' was introduced. Four German hospitals participated between 2007 and 2009.Secondary analyses included a convenience sample of 999 low-risk women from the primary analyses who met the selection criterion 'low-risk status'. Participation was voluntary. The association between the mode of birth and the key variables 'attendance of midwives' and 'workload of midwives' was assessed using backward logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The overall rate of spontaneous delivery was 80.7% (n = 763). The 'attendance of midwives' and the 'workload of midwives' did not exhibit a significant association with the mode of birth. However, women who were not satisfied with the presence of midwives (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.54-3.95) or who did not receive supportive procedures by midwives (OR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.50-6.05) were significantly more likely to experience operative delivery or a caesarean. Further explanatory variables include the type of hospital, participation in childbirth preparation class, length of stay from admission to birth, oxytocin usage and parity.

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction with the presence of and supportive procedures by midwives are associated with the mode of birth. The presence and behaviour of midwives should suit the woman's expectations and fulfil her needs. For reasons of causality, we would recommend experimental or quasi-experimental research that would exceed the explorative character of this study.

摘要

背景

大多数欧洲国家剖宫产率持续上升引发了诸多担忧。这一发展趋势的一个因素可能是女性在分娩期间接受的护理类型。助产士提供的“分娩期间的支持性护理”可能是减少恐惧、紧张和疼痛以及降低剖宫产率的重要因素。助产士根据女性需求提供支持的在场情况和可及性是“分娩期间的支持性护理”的核心方面。迄今为止,尚无关于德国助产士有效的“支持性护理”对分娩方式影响的现有研究。本研究在德国多中心样本中的低风险女性群体中,考察助产士的在场情况和工作量与分娩结局方式之间的关联。

方法

数据基于一项前瞻性对照多中心试验(n = 1238),其中引入了“助产士主导的护理”干预措施。2007年至2009年期间,四家德国医院参与了该试验。二次分析纳入了来自初步分析的999名符合“低风险状态”选择标准的低风险女性的便利样本。参与是自愿的。使用向后逻辑回归模型评估分娩方式与关键变量“助产士的在场情况”和“助产士的工作量”之间的关联。

结果

自然分娩的总体发生率为80.7%(n = 763)。“助产士的在场情况”和“助产士的工作量”与分娩方式未呈现显著关联。然而,对助产士在场情况不满意的女性(比值比:2.45,95%置信区间1.54 - 3.95)或未接受助产士支持性程序的女性(比值比:3.01,95%置信区间1.50 - 6.05)更有可能经历手术分娩或剖宫产。进一步的解释变量包括医院类型、参加分娩准备课程情况、入院至分娩的住院时间、催产素使用情况和产次。

结论

对助产士在场情况和支持性程序的满意度与分娩方式相关。助产士的在场情况和行为应符合女性的期望并满足其需求。出于因果关系的原因,我们建议开展超越本研究探索性质的实验性或准实验性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0453/4164747/127f997877ec/12884_2013_1182_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

3
The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives' antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Dec;50(12):1689-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
4
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15(9):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4.
5
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
6
Midwives' care on a labour ward prior to the introduction of a midwifery model of care: a field of tension.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1593037. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1593037.
8
Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
Midwifery. 2016 Apr;35:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
[Midwife attendance during labour and its relation to interventions and outcome of birth].
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2008 Oct;212(5):176-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076979. Epub 2008 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Do current maternal health staffing and bed occupancy benchmarks work in practice? Results from a simulation model.
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jan 19;2(1):e000212. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000212. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Obstetric and non-obstetric risk factors for cesarean section in oman.
Oman Med J. 2012 Nov;27(6):478-81. doi: 10.5001/omj.2012.114.
4
Social predictors of caesarean section births in Italy.
Afr Health Sci. 2011 Dec;11(4):560-5.
5
A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery.
BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):915-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03334.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
6
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.
7
The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it.
Biosci Trends. 2011 Aug;5(4):139-50. doi: 10.5582/bst.2011.v5.4.139.
8
What is meant by one-to-one support in labour: analysing the concept.
Midwifery. 2012 Aug;28(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
9
Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007.
Birth. 2011 Jun;38(2):99-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
10
Continuous support for women during childbirth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验