Butts Ryan J, Spencer Carolyn T, Jackson Lanier, Heal Martha E, Forbus Geoffrey, Hulsey Thomas C, Atz Andrew M
Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, 165 Ashley Avenue, MSC 915, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA,
Pediatr Cardiol. 2015 Feb;36(2):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-1020-5. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a common method of evaluating patients with a Fontan circulation. Equations to calculate predicted CPET values are based on children with normal circulation. This study aims to create predictive equations for CPET variables solely based on patients with Fontan circulation. Patients who performed CPET in the multicenter Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study were screened. Peak variable equations were calculated using patients who performed a maximal test (RER > 1.1) and anaerobic threshold (AT) variable equations on patients where AT was adequately calculated. Eighty percent of each cohort was randomly selected to derive the predictive equation and the remaining served as a validation cohort. Linear regression analysis was performed for each CPET variable within the derivation cohort. The resulting equations were applied to calculate predicted values in the validation cohort. Observed versus predicted variables were compared in the validation cohort using linear regression. 411 patients underwent CPET, 166 performed maximal exercise tests and 317 had adequately calculated AT. Predictive equations for peak CPET variables had good performance; peak VO2, R (2) = 0.61; maximum work, R (2) = 0.61; maximum O2 pulse, R (2) = 0.59. The equations for CPET variables at AT explained less of the variability; VO2 at AT, R (2) = 0.15; work at AT, R (2) = 0.39; O2 pulse at AT, R (2) = 0.34; VE/VCO2 at AT, R (2) = 0.18; VE/VO2 at AT, R (2) = 0.14. Only the models for VE/VCO2 and VE/VO2 at AT had significantly worse performance in validation cohort. Of the 8 equations for commonly measured CPET variables, six were able to be validated. The equations for peak variables were more robust in explaining variation in values than AT equations.
心肺运动试验(CPET)是评估接受Fontan循环手术患者的常用方法。计算预测CPET值的公式是基于具有正常循环的儿童得出的。本研究旨在仅根据接受Fontan循环手术的患者创建CPET变量的预测公式。对在多中心儿科心脏网络Fontan横断面研究中进行CPET的患者进行了筛选。使用进行最大测试(呼吸交换率>1.1)的患者计算峰值变量公式,并对无氧阈值(AT)计算充分的患者计算无氧阈值变量公式。每个队列的80%被随机选择用于推导预测公式,其余作为验证队列。对推导队列中的每个CPET变量进行线性回归分析。将所得公式应用于计算验证队列中的预测值。在验证队列中使用线性回归比较观察变量与预测变量。411名患者进行了CPET,166名进行了最大运动测试,317名患者的AT计算充分。CPET峰值变量的预测公式表现良好;峰值摄氧量,R(2)=0.61;最大功,R(2)=0.61;最大氧脉搏,R(2)=0.59。AT时CPET变量的公式解释的变异性较小;AT时的摄氧量,R(2)=0.15;AT时的功,R(2)=0.39;AT时的氧脉搏,R(2)=0.34;AT时的每分钟通气量/二氧化碳排出量,R(2)=0.18;AT时的每分钟通气量/摄氧量,R(2)=0.14。只有AT时每分钟通气量/二氧化碳排出量和每分钟通气量/摄氧量的模型在验证队列中的表现明显更差。在8个常用CPET变量的公式中,有6个能够得到验证。峰值变量的公式在解释值的变化方面比AT公式更稳健。