Verhamme Luc M, Meijer Gert J, Bergé Stefaan J, Soehardi Rik A, Xi Tong, de Haan Anton F J, Schutyser Filip, Maal Thomas J J
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Implantology and Periodontology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1154-63. doi: 10.1111/cid.12230. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
The purpose of this study was to determine the clinically relevant accuracy of implant placement in the augmented maxilla using computer planning and a mucosa-supported surgical template.
Twenty-five consecutive edentulous patients with an extreme maxillar alveolar ridge resorption were treated with a bone augmentation procedure. In a second stage, six Brånemark MkIII Groovy (Nobel Biocare®, Zürich, Switzerland) implants were installed. Preoperatively, a cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired, followed by virtual implant planning and flapless implant placement using a surgical template. A postoperative CBCT scan was acquired and registered to the preoperative scan. The Implant Position Orthogonal Projection validation method was applied to measure implant deviations in both the buccolingual and mesio-distal plane. The influence of fixation pins and the position on the dental arch were investigated with regard to implant deviations, and rotations and translations of the surgical template.
One hundred fifty implants were installed. In mesio-distal direction, a mean implant deviation of 1.50 mm was scored at the implant tip, 1.27 mm at the shoulder, -0.60 mm in depth, as well as a mean deviation of angulation of 2.50°. In buccolingual direction, a mean implant deviation of 0.99 mm was found at the implant tip, 0.76 mm at the implant shoulder, -0.57 mm in depth, and a deviation of angulation of 2.48°. Of all implants, 53% was placed too superficial compared with the planning. The use of fixation pins and implant deviations in both buccal and mesial directions as also for rotations and translation of the surgical template showed statistically significant differences.
Computer-aided implant planning showed to be a clinically relevant tool. However, this study emphasizes that the surgeon should take into account that deviations are larger compared with implant placement without augmentation procedure. Deviations are mainly caused by angulations and translations of the surgical template.
本研究的目的是确定使用计算机规划和黏膜支持的手术模板在增量上颌骨中植入种植体的临床相关准确性。
连续25例上颌牙槽嵴严重吸收的无牙患者接受骨增量手术。在第二阶段,植入6枚Brånemark MkIII Groovy(诺贝尔生物保健公司,瑞士苏黎世)种植体。术前,进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),随后进行虚拟种植体规划,并使用手术模板进行无瓣种植体植入。术后进行CBCT扫描并与术前扫描进行配准。应用种植体位置正交投影验证方法测量种植体在颊舌向和近远中平面的偏差。研究固定针和在牙弓上的位置对种植体偏差以及手术模板的旋转和平移的影响。
共植入150枚种植体。在近远中方向,种植体尖端的平均偏差为1.50mm,肩部为1.27mm,深度为 -0.60mm,角度平均偏差为2.50°。在颊舌方向,种植体尖端的平均偏差为0.99mm,种植体肩部为0.76mm,深度为 -0.57mm,角度偏差为2.48°。与规划相比,所有种植体中有53%放置得过于表浅。固定针的使用以及颊侧和近中方向的种植体偏差以及手术模板的旋转和平移显示出统计学上的显著差异。
计算机辅助种植体规划是一种临床相关工具。然而,本研究强调外科医生应考虑到与未进行增量手术的种植体植入相比,偏差更大。偏差主要由手术模板的角度和位移引起。