• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机引导种植手术在部分牙缺失患者中的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Faculty of dental medicine, Campus of Medical Sciences, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Damascus Road, Beirut, 1104 2020, Lebanon.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jul 16;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z
PMID:39012381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11252094/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the amount of distortion using computer-guided implant surgery with 3D printed surgical guides in limited edentulous spaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

25 bone level self-tapping implants (Straumann® BL and BLT) were randomly inserted in either distal or intercalary posterior mandibular edentulism using a fully digital protocol and 3D printed surgical guides. Amount of inaccuracy was evaluated after superimposing the 3 coordinates of virtually planned and final implant images, which were obtained using intra-oral scans and scan bodies. Four evaluation parameters were considered: origo-displacement, error depth, apical displacement and angle between the planned and the placed implant.

RESULTS

The average of distortion was 0.71 mm for the origo-displacement, 0.36 mm for the error depth, 0.52 mm for the horizontal displacement and 3.34º for the error angle.

CONCLUSION

The major reason of exclusion was CBCT artifacts. Results of this study were aligned with the results of previous studies concerning partially edentulous spaces. CAD/CAM manufacturing process did not result in significant distortion whilst the biggest part of distortions originated from the surgical process. The learning curve in computer-guided implant surgery presented an important source of inaccuracy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在有限的无牙颌空间中使用计算机引导的种植手术和 3D 打印手术导板的失真量。

材料和方法

使用完全数字化的方案和 3D 打印手术导板,将 25 个骨水平自攻种植体(Straumann® BL 和 BLT)随机插入下颌后牙区远中端或中间缺失部位。通过对口腔内扫描和扫描体获得的虚拟计划和最终种植体图像的 3 个坐标进行叠加,评估不准确的程度。考虑了 4 个评估参数:原点位移、误差深度、根尖位移和计划种植体与放置种植体之间的角度。

结果

原点位移的平均失真度为 0.71mm,误差深度为 0.36mm,水平位移为 0.52mm,误差角度为 3.34°。

结论

主要的排除原因是 CBCT 伪影。本研究的结果与以前关于部分无牙颌空间的研究结果一致。CAD/CAM 制造过程没有导致明显的失真,而大部分失真源于手术过程。计算机引导种植手术的学习曲线是造成不准确的一个重要原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/f98a1a20429f/40729_2024_552_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/868f7688ec46/40729_2024_552_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/eac713c0ac20/40729_2024_552_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/e66ef609c53e/40729_2024_552_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/0b380f789b25/40729_2024_552_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/2fa0bed30527/40729_2024_552_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/dfecdfc81bac/40729_2024_552_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/def7b23d6a92/40729_2024_552_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/26e16b4b6a90/40729_2024_552_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/f98a1a20429f/40729_2024_552_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/868f7688ec46/40729_2024_552_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/eac713c0ac20/40729_2024_552_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/e66ef609c53e/40729_2024_552_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/0b380f789b25/40729_2024_552_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/2fa0bed30527/40729_2024_552_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/dfecdfc81bac/40729_2024_552_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/def7b23d6a92/40729_2024_552_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/26e16b4b6a90/40729_2024_552_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7579/11252094/f98a1a20429f/40729_2024_552_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients: a prospective observational study.计算机引导种植手术在部分牙缺失患者中的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Jul 16;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z.
2
Accuracy of guided dental implant surgery using a fully digital workflow: A case series.全数字化流程引导下的牙种植手术精度:病例系列研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov;132(5):973-980. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.016. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.引导式与徒手式种植体植入的体外比较:使用新型组合式TRIOS表面扫描、种植体工作室、锥形束CT以及立体光刻虚拟规划与引导技术
Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(2):87-95.
4
In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.使用桌面立体光刻打印机制作的体内牙支持式种植手术导板:完全引导手术比部分引导手术更精确。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;76(7):1431-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.计算机辅助口腔种植手术的准确性:一项临床与影像学研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):234-42.
6
Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.计算机引导与徒手植入即刻负重牙种植体:一项多中心随机对照试验的加载后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):229-42.
7
The accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery in partially edentulous patients and possible influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机引导手术在部分无牙颌患者中种植体植入精度及可能的影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jan 11;66(1):29-39. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00184. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
8
Optical Accuracy Assessment of Robotically Assisted Dental Implant Surgery for Partially Edentulous Patients: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial.机器人辅助牙种植手术在部分缺牙患者中的光学精度评估:一项单臂临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Aug 29;39(4):625-631. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10592.
9
Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.影响基于模板的锥形束 CT 引导种植体放置转移精度的因素。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Apr;23(4):416-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02337.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.手术导板固定和种植体位置对静态计算机辅助种植手术精度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):155-164. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13371. Epub 2021 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The Zygomatic Buttress as an Efficient Intraoral Donor Site for Limited Maxillary Reconstructions: A Case Series and Brief Literature Review.颧突支柱作为上颌骨有限重建的有效口腔内供区:病例系列及文献简要综述
Case Rep Dent. 2021 May 3;2021:5539185. doi: 10.1155/2021/5539185. eCollection 2021.
2
Does flap opening or not influence the accuracy of semi-guided implant placement in partially edentulous sites?在部分缺牙部位,瓣的打开与否是否会影响半引导种植体放置的准确性?
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1253-1261. doi: 10.1111/cid.12847. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
导套高度、钻孔距离和钻孔关键长度对静态计算机辅助种植手术精度的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):101-107. doi: 10.1111/cid.12705. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study.无瓣即刻种植在前上颌骨中应用计算机辅助与徒手手术的准确性:一项尸体研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec;29(12):1186-1194. doi: 10.1111/clr.13382. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.静态计算机辅助种植手术的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:416-435. doi: 10.1111/clr.13346.
6
A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients.徒手、导钻引导和全引导种植手术在部分缺牙患者中准确性的随机对照研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12897. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study.引导式种植手术经验在准确性方面起到多大作用?一项随机对照试验性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;46(7):922-930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws.使用接骨螺钉对计算机规划的上颌骨增量术中种植体植入的准确性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
The Accuracy of Implant Placement by Experienced Surgeons: Guided vs Freehand Approach in a Simulated Plastic Model.经验丰富的外科医生进行种植体植入的准确性:在模拟塑料模型中引导式与徒手操作方法的比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(3):617–624. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5065. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides.锥形束计算机断层扫描数据和口内表面扫描的注册 - CAD/CAM 钻孔导板引导种植手术的前提条件。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Sep;28(9):1113-1118. doi: 10.1111/clr.12925. Epub 2016 Jul 20.