National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Australia.
Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Mar;26(3):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
How cannabis cultivation is dealt with under various examples of cannabis legalization or regulation is an important consideration in design of such schemes. This study aimed to (i) investigate support among current or recent cannabis growers, for various potential policy options for cannabis cultivation if prohibition were repealed, and (ii) explore the support for these options across countries, scale of growing operations, demographics, drug use and cannabis supply involvement variables.
This study utilized data from the online web survey of largely 'small-scale' cannabis cultivators, aged 18yrs and over, in eleven countries conducted by the Global Cannabis Cultivation Research Consortium (GCCRC). Data from 1722 current and recent cannabis growers in Australia, Denmark and the UK, who were all asked about policy, were included in the analysis. It investigated support for various frameworks for cultivation: (no regulation (free market); adult only; growing licenses; restrictions on plant numbers; licensed business-only sale; approved commercial growing; etc.). Among current growers, support for these options were compared across countries, across scale of growing operations, and by demographics, drug use and crime variables.
Although there were some between country differences in support for the various policy options, what was striking was the similarity of the proportions for each of the eight most popular policy options. Among current growers, many of these positions were predicted by demographic, drug use and cannabis growing variables which were conceptually congruent with these positions.
The results have relevance for the provisions regarding cannabis cultivation in the design of new non-prohibitionist models of cannabis which are increasingly under consideration. It should be of interest to policy makers, drug policy researchers, law enforcement and cannabis cultivators.
在各种大麻合法化或监管的例子下,大麻种植的处理方式是此类计划设计的一个重要考虑因素。本研究旨在:(i) 调查如果大麻禁令被废除,当前或最近的大麻种植者对大麻种植的各种潜在政策选择的支持程度,以及 (ii) 探索这些选择在不同国家、种植规模、人口统计学、毒品使用和大麻供应参与变量中的支持程度。
本研究利用了全球大麻种植研究联盟(GCCRC)在 11 个国家进行的在线网络调查中,年龄在 18 岁及以上的“小规模”大麻种植者的数据。该调查询问了澳大利亚、丹麦和英国的 1722 名当前和最近的大麻种植者关于政策的问题,这些数据被包括在分析中。调查了以下几种种植框架的支持情况:(无监管(自由市场);仅限成年人;种植许可证;限制植物数量;仅限许可业务销售;批准商业种植;等等)。在当前的种植者中,比较了这些选择在不同国家、不同种植规模和人口统计学、毒品使用和犯罪变量方面的支持程度。
尽管不同国家对各种政策选择的支持程度存在一些差异,但令人惊讶的是,最受欢迎的 8 种政策选择中的每一种的比例都非常相似。在当前的种植者中,这些立场中的许多都是由人口统计学、毒品使用和大麻种植变量来预测的,这些变量在概念上与这些立场是一致的。
这些结果对于在越来越多考虑的非禁止大麻的新型大麻模式的设计中,关于大麻种植的规定具有相关性。这应该引起政策制定者、毒品政策研究人员、执法人员和大麻种植者的兴趣。