Department of Addictology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General Teaching Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Institutional Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Prague.
Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Politics and Public Administration, Netherlands.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Mar;26(3):296-310. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
This paper uses the framework of institutional economics to assess the impact of formal and informal institutions that influence the transaction costs on the cannabis market, and users' decisions to self-supply in the Czech Republic and the Netherlands, two countries with seemingly identical policies towards cannabis cultivation.
A comparative analysis was conducted using secondary qualitative and quantitative data in four areas that were identified as relevant to the decision to cultivate cannabis: (i) the rules of the game - cannabis cultivation policy; (ii) "playing the game" - implementation of cannabis cultivation policy, (iii) informal institutions - cannabis cultivation culture, and (iv) the transaction costs of the cannabis market - availability, quality, and relative cannabis prices adjusted by purchasing power parity.
Although the two policies are similar, their implementation differs substantially. In the Czech Republic, law enforcement has focused almost exclusively on large-scale cultivation. This has resulted in a competitive small-scale cultivation market, built upon a history of cannabis self-supply, which is pushing cannabis prices down. In the Netherlands, the costs of establishing one's own self-supply have historically outweighed the costs associated with buying in coffee shops. Additionally, law enforcement has recently pushed small-scale growers away from the market, and a large-scale cannabis supply, partly controlled by organised criminal groups, has been established that is driving prices up. The Czech cannabis prices have become relatively lower than the Dutch prices only recently, and the decision to buy on the market or to self-supply will be further shaped by the transactions costs on both markets, by policy implementation and by the local culture.
The ability to learn from the impacts of cannabis cultivation policies conducted within the framework of UN drug treaties is particularly important at a time when increasing numbers of countries are seeking more radical reforms of their cannabis policy.
本文运用制度经济学框架,评估影响大麻市场交易成本的正式和非正式制度,以及使用者在捷克共和国和荷兰这两个对大麻种植政策看似相同的国家自供的决策。
采用二次定性和定量数据进行比较分析,涉及到四个与大麻种植决策相关的领域:(i)规则制定-大麻种植政策;(ii)“游戏规则”-大麻种植政策的执行;(iii)非正式制度-大麻种植文化;(iv)大麻市场的交易成本-可获得性、质量和经购买力平价调整的相对大麻价格。
尽管这两个政策相似,但执行情况却大不相同。在捷克共和国,执法部门几乎完全专注于大规模种植。这导致了一个竞争激烈的小规模种植市场,建立在大麻自供的历史基础上,压低了大麻价格。在荷兰,建立自己的自供所的成本历来高于在咖啡店购买的成本。此外,执法部门最近将小规模种植者挤出市场,一个由有组织犯罪集团部分控制的大规模大麻供应已经建立起来,推高了价格。捷克大麻价格直到最近才相对低于荷兰价格,而在市场上购买或自供的决定将进一步受到两个市场的交易成本、政策执行情况和当地文化的影响。
在越来越多的国家寻求更激进的大麻政策改革之际,在联合国毒品条约框架内开展大麻种植政策影响的学习能力尤为重要。