Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3404-6. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
To evaluate whether iterative reconstruction algorithms improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for detection of lipid-core plaque (LCP) compared to histology.
CCTA and histological data were acquired from three ex vivo hearts. CCTA images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive-statistical (ASIR) and model-based (MBIR) iterative algorithms. Vessel cross-sections were co-registered between FBP/ASIR/MBIR and histology. Plaque area <60 HU was semiautomatically quantified in CCTA. LCP was defined by histology as fibroatheroma with a large lipid/necrotic core. Area under the curve (AUC) was derived from logistic regression analysis as a measure of diagnostic accuracy.
Overall, 173 CCTA triplets (FBP/ASIR/MBIR) were co-registered with histology. LCP was present in 26 cross-sections. Average measured plaque area <60 HU was significantly larger in LCP compared to non-LCP cross-sections (mm(2): 5.78 ± 2.29 vs. 3.39 ± 1.68 FBP; 5.92 ± 1.87 vs. 3.43 ± 1.62 ASIR; 6.40 ± 1.55 vs. 3.49 ± 1.50 MBIR; all p < 0.0001). AUC for detecting LCP was 0.803/0.850/0.903 for FBP/ASIR/MBIR and was significantly higher for MBIR compared to FBP (p = 0.01). MBIR increased sensitivity for detection of LCP by CCTA.
Plaque area <60 HU in CCTA was associated with LCP in histology regardless of the reconstruction algorithm. However, MBIR demonstrated higher accuracy for detecting LCP, which may improve vulnerable plaque detection by CCTA.
• A low attenuation plaque area is associated with the presence of lipid-core plaque • MBIR leads to higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting lipid-core plaque • The benefit of MBIR is mainly due to increased sensitivity at high specificities • Semiautomated CCTA assessment can detect vulnerable plaques non-invasively.
评估迭代重建算法相较于组织病理学是否能提高冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术(CCTA)对脂质核心斑块(LCP)的诊断准确性。
从 3 个离体心脏中获取 CCTA 和组织学数据。使用滤波反投影(FBP)、自适应统计(ASIR)和基于模型(MBIR)迭代算法重建 CCTA 图像。在 FBP/ASIR/MBIR 和组织学之间对血管横截面积进行配准。半自动定量 CCTA 中<60HU 的斑块面积。组织学将纤维脂斑伴有大脂质/坏死核心定义为 LCP。曲线下面积(AUC)来自逻辑回归分析,作为诊断准确性的衡量指标。
共对 173 个 CCTA 三联体(FBP/ASIR/MBIR)与组织学进行了配准。26 个横截面上存在 LCP。与非 LCP 横截面对比,LCP 处平均测量的<60HU 斑块面积明显更大(mm²:FBP 为 5.78 ± 2.29 对比 3.39 ± 1.68;ASIR 为 5.92 ± 1.87 对比 3.43 ± 1.62;MBIR 为 6.40 ± 1.55 对比 3.49 ± 1.50;均 p<0.0001)。FBP/ASIR/MBIR 检测 LCP 的 AUC 分别为 0.803/0.850/0.903,MBIR 明显高于 FBP(p=0.01)。MBIR 提高了 CCTA 检测 LCP 的敏感度。
CCTA 中<60HU 的斑块面积与组织学中的 LCP 相关,与重建算法无关。然而,MBIR 对 LCP 的检测准确性更高,这可能会提高 CCTA 对易损斑块的检测能力。
低衰减斑块面积与脂质核心斑块的存在相关。
MBIR 提高了检测脂质核心斑块的诊断准确性。
MBIR 的优势主要归因于在高特异性时增加了敏感度。
半自动 CCTA 评估可无创性检测易损斑块。