Keen Justin
University of Leeds, UK
Health Informatics J. 2014 Sep;20(3):168-75. doi: 10.1177/1460458213494033.
This article reviews large-scale digital developments in the National Health Service in England in recent years and argues that there is a mismatch between digital and organisational thinking and practice. The arguments are based on new institutional thinking, where the digital infrastructure is taken to be an institution, which has been shaped over a long period, and which in turn shapes the behaviour of health professionals, managers and others. Many digital services are still being designed in line with a bureaucratic data processing model. Yet health services are increasingly based on a network model, where health professionals and service managers require information systems that allow them to manage risks proactively and to coordinate multiple services on behalf of patients. This article further argues that the data processing model is being reinforced by Open Data policies and by related developments in the acquisition of genomic and telehealth data, suggesting that the mismatch will persist. There is, therefore, an ongoing tension between frontline and central objectives for digital services. It may be that the tension can only be resolved when--or if--there is trust between the interested parties.
本文回顾了近年来英国国民医疗服务体系中的大规模数字发展情况,并认为数字思维与组织思维及实践之间存在不匹配。这些论点基于新制度主义思维,即数字基础设施被视为一种制度,它经过长期形成,反过来又塑造了卫生专业人员、管理人员及其他人员的行为。许多数字服务仍按照官僚主义的数据处理模式进行设计。然而,医疗服务越来越基于网络模式,在这种模式下,卫生专业人员和服务管理人员需要信息系统,以便他们能够主动管理风险并代表患者协调多种服务。本文进一步指出,开放数据政策以及基因组和远程医疗数据获取方面的相关发展正在强化数据处理模式,这表明这种不匹配将持续存在。因此,数字服务的一线目标与核心目标之间存在持续的紧张关系。只有当(或者如果)相关方之间存在信任时,这种紧张关系才可能得到解决。