Merchant Sherin N, Vovk Andrea, Kalash Danny, Hovencamp Nicole, Aukhil Ikramuddin, Harrison Peter, Zapert Edward, Bidwell John, Varnado Phyllis, Shaddox Luciana M
Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
J Periodontol. 2014 Dec;85(12):1722-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140171.
The comparative treatment response of children and young adults with localized aggressive periodontitis treatment (LAgP) affecting primary and permanent dentition is unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of non-surgical periodontal therapy with adjunctive systemic antibiotics on the clinical outcome of children and young adults with primary versus permanent dentition affected by LAgP.
A cohort of 97 African American participants aged 5 to 21 years (30 males and 67 females; 22 primary and 75 permanent dentitions affected) diagnosed with LAgP were included. Patients presented with no significant medical history. All patients underwent periodontal therapy, which consisted of full-mouth mechanical debridement at baseline and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month appointments. Additionally, all patients were prescribed a 1-week regimen of systemic antibiotics at the initial appointment. Clinical parameters were analyzed, including probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing, and percentage of visible plaque.
Overall, periodontal therapy was found to be effective in improving the clinical outcomes of both primary and permanent dentitions. Although baseline CALs were similar between the groups, the reduction in mean CAL at 3, 6, and 12 months and reduction in percentage plaque at 3 months were significantly greater in primary dentition compared with permanent dentition.
Non-surgical therapy with systemic antibiotics is effective for LAgP in both primary and permanent dentitions. A greater reduction in CAL in LAgP of primary dentition may suggest that younger children may carry a greater propensity for positive treatment outcomes and healing potential compared with children/young adults with permanent dentition.
局部侵袭性牙周炎(LAgP)对儿童和年轻成人乳牙及恒牙治疗反应的比较尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估非手术牙周治疗联合全身用抗生素对患有LAgP的乳牙列和恒牙列儿童及年轻成人临床疗效的影响。
纳入97名年龄在5至21岁的非裔美国参与者队列(30名男性和67名女性;22例乳牙列和75例恒牙列受累),诊断为LAgP。患者无重大病史。所有患者均接受牙周治疗,包括在基线以及3、6和12个月复诊时进行全口机械清创。此外,所有患者在初次就诊时均接受为期1周的全身抗生素治疗。分析临床参数,包括探诊深度、临床附着水平(CAL)、探诊出血和可见菌斑百分比。
总体而言,牙周治疗被发现对乳牙列和恒牙列的临床疗效均有改善。尽管两组基线CAL相似,但与恒牙列相比,乳牙列在3、6和12个月时平均CAL的降低以及3个月时菌斑百分比的降低显著更大。
全身用抗生素的非手术治疗对乳牙列和恒牙列的LAgP均有效。乳牙列LAgP中CAL的更大降低可能表明,与恒牙列儿童/年轻成人相比,年幼儿童可能具有更大的积极治疗结果倾向和愈合潜力。