• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别术后发生并发症且有抢救失败风险的患者。

Identification of patients with postoperative complications who are at risk for failure to rescue.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington2Department of Surgery, Lexington Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky.

Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1103-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1338.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1338
PMID:25188264
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A minority of patients who experience postoperative complications die (failure to rescue). Understanding the preoperative factors that lead to failure to rescue helps surgeons predict and avoid operative mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a mechanism for identifying a high-risk group of patients with postoperative complications who are at a substantially increased risk for failure to rescue.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study evaluating failure to rescue in patients entered into the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The large sample of surgical patients included in this study underwent a wide range of operations during a 5-year period in more than 200 acute care hospitals. We examined and identified patients at high risk for failure to rescue using propensity stratification. We also developed a risk-scoring system that allowed preoperative identification of patients at the highest risk for failure to rescue.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risk-scoring system that predicts failure to rescue.

RESULTS

Of the 1,956,002 database patients, there were 207,236 patients who developed serious postoperative complications. Deaths occurred in 21,731 patients with serious complications (10.5% failure to rescue). Stratification of patients into quintiles, according to their propensity for developing serious complications, found that 90% of operative deaths occurred in the highest-risk quintile, usually within a week of developing the initial complication. A risk-scoring system for failure to rescue, based on regression-derived variable odds ratios, predicted patients in the highest-risk quintile with good predictive accuracy. Only 31.8% of failure-to-rescue patients had a single postoperative complication. Perioperative deaths increased exponentially as the number of complications per patient increased. Patients with complications who had surgical residents involved in their care had reduced rates of failure to rescue compared with patients without resident involvement.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Twenty percent of high-risk patients account for 90% of failure to rescue (Pareto principle). More than two-thirds of patients with failure to rescue have multiple complications. On average, a few days elapse before death following a complication. A risk-scoring system based on preoperative variables predicts patients in the highest-risk category of failure to rescue with good accuracy. In high-risk patients who develop complications, our results suggest that early intervention, preferably in a high-level intensive care facility with a surgical training program, offers the best chance to reduce failure-to-rescue rates.

摘要

重要性

少数经历术后并发症的患者死亡(抢救失败)。了解导致抢救失败的术前因素有助于外科医生预测和避免手术死亡率。

目的

提供一种机制,以识别术后并发症高风险患者群体,这些患者的抢救失败风险显著增加。

设计、设置和患者:观察性研究评估美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库中患者的抢救失败。这项研究中的大量手术患者在五年期间在 200 多家急症护理医院接受了广泛的手术。我们通过倾向分层检查并确定抢救失败风险高的患者。我们还开发了一种风险评分系统,允许术前识别抢救失败风险最高的患者。

主要结果和措施

预测抢救失败的风险评分系统。

结果

在 1956002 名数据库患者中,有 207236 名患者出现严重术后并发症。21731 名严重并发症患者死亡(抢救失败率为 10.5%)。根据发生严重并发症的倾向将患者分层到五分位数,发现 90%的手术死亡发生在风险最高的五分位数,通常在发生初始并发症后的一周内。基于回归衍生变量比值比的抢救失败风险评分系统具有良好的预测准确性,可以预测风险最高的五分位数患者。只有 31.8%的抢救失败患者只有单一术后并发症。随着患者每例并发症的数量增加,围手术期死亡率呈指数级增加。与无住院医师参与治疗的患者相比,有住院医师参与治疗的并发症患者抢救失败率降低。

结论和相关性

20%的高危患者占抢救失败的 90%(帕累托原则)。超过三分之二的抢救失败患者有多种并发症。通常,在并发症发生后几天内死亡。基于术前变量的风险评分系统可以很好地预测抢救失败风险最高的患者。对于发生并发症的高危患者,我们的研究结果表明,早期干预,最好在具有外科培训计划的高水平重症监护病房进行,为降低抢救失败率提供了最佳机会。

相似文献

1
Identification of patients with postoperative complications who are at risk for failure to rescue.识别术后发生并发症且有抢救失败风险的患者。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1103-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1338.
2
Blood transfusion and adverse surgical outcomes: The good and the bad.输血与手术不良结局:利弊分析
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):608-17. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.027. Epub 2015 May 29.
3
Failure-to-rescue rate as a measure of quality of care in a cardiac surgery recovery unit: a five-year study.心脏外科恢复单元中以抢救失败率作为护理质量的衡量标准:一项为期五年的研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.097. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
4
Variation in hospital complication rates and failure-to-rescue for trauma patients.创伤患者的医院并发症发生率和抢救失败率的差异。
Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):811-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211d872.
5
Failure to rescue and pulmonary resection for lung cancer.肺癌的抢救失败与肺切除术
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1365-71; discussion 1371-3.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.063. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的164家医院食管癌切除术后的短期结局:手术方式及医院层面差异的影响
Arch Surg. 2012 Nov;147(11):1009-16. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.96.
7
Relationship Between Hospital Performance on a Patient Satisfaction Survey and Surgical Quality.患者满意度调查中医院绩效与手术质量的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):858-64. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1108.
8
Risk of major nonemergent inpatient general surgical procedures in patients on long-term dialysis.长期血液透析患者接受大型非紧急住院普外科手术的风险。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Feb;148(2):137-43. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.347.
9
Hospital variation in failure to rescue after colorectal cancer surgery: results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.荷兰外科结直肠审计:结直肠癌手术后未能抢救的医院差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;20(7):2117-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2896-7. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
10
Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.确定老年胃肠手术患者的具体质量改进机会。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1013-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.114.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of impaired intrinsic capacity on postoperative frailty in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: study protocol for a single-center, prospective, cohort study.内在能力受损对老年结直肠癌手术患者术后虚弱的影响:一项单中心、前瞻性队列研究的研究方案
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 May 12;17:1523642. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1523642. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcomes following extended postoperative recovery unit admission in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非心脏手术术后延长恢复室入住后的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 May 1;42(5):407-418. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002145. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
3
Ethnic disparities in pediatric appendicitis: the impact of hispanic ethnicity on presentation, complications, and postoperative outcomes.
儿童阑尾炎的种族差异:西班牙裔种族对表现、并发症和术后结果的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb 22;39(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04598-8.
4
Troponin elevation as a marker of short deterioration and one-year death in a high-risk surgical patient cohort in a low and middle income country setting: a postoperative approach to increase surveillance.肌钙蛋白升高是中低收入国家高危手术患者队列短期恶化和一年死亡的标志物:一种增加监测的术后方法。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;70(11):1776-1788. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02558-4. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Perioperative neurocognitive disorder changes in elderly diabetes patients within 30 days after surgery: a retrospective cohort study.老年糖尿病患者术后30天内的围手术期神经认知障碍变化:一项回顾性队列研究
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Dec;35(12):2911-2918. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02583-9. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
Systemic causes are important risk factors for failure after unscheduled colorectal revision surgery.系统原因是计划外结直肠修正手术后失败的重要危险因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 16;408(1):360. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03076-z.
7
Failure to rescue as a patient safety indicator for neurosurgical patients: are we there yet? A systematic review.未能抢救作为神经外科患者的患者安全指标:我们做到了吗?系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Sep 6;46(1):227. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02137-7.
8
Frailty: the perioperative and anesthesia challenges of an emerging pandemic.衰弱:新兴大流行病的围手术期和麻醉挑战。
J Anesth. 2023 Aug;37(4):624-640. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03206-3. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
9
Failure to rescue following anatomical lung resection. Analysis of a prospective nationwide database.解剖性肺切除术后的抢救失败。一项全国性前瞻性数据库分析。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 21;10:1077046. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1077046. eCollection 2023.
10
Network prediction of surgical complication clusters: a prospective multicenter cohort study.网络预测手术并发症簇:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Sci China Life Sci. 2023 Jul;66(7):1636-1646. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2200-1. Epub 2023 Mar 3.