From the VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO (T.M.M., M.A.S., C.O., M.E.P., S.M.B., P.M.H., T.T.T., J.S.R.); University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO (T.M.M., M.A.S., C.O., M.E.P., S.M.B., P.M.H., T.T.T., J.S.R.); Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO (T.T.T.); Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL (A.R.S., B.S.); and Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (R.J.J.).
Circulation. 2014 Oct 14;130(16):1383-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009713. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
The safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at medical facilities without on-site cardiothoracic (CT) surgery has been established in clinical trials. However, the comparative effectiveness of this strategy in real-world practice, including impact on patient access and outcomes, is uncertain. The Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system has used this strategy, with strict quality oversight, since 2005, and can provide insight into this question.
Among 24,387 patients receiving PCI at VA facilities between October 2007 and September 2010, 6616 (27.1%) patients underwent PCI at facilities (n=18) without on-site CT surgery. Patient drive time (as a proxy for access), procedural complications, 1-year mortality, myocardial infarction, and rates of subsequent revascularization procedures were compared by facility. Results were stratified by procedural indication (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina versus elective) and PCI volume. With the inclusion of PCI facilities without on-site CT surgery, median drive time for patients treated at those facilities decreased by 90.8 minutes (P<0.001). Procedural need for emergent coronary artery bypass graft and mortality rates were low and similar between facilities. Adjusted 1-year mortality and myocardial infarction rates were similar between facilities (hazard ratio in PCI facilities without relative to those with on-site CT surgery, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.2), and not modified by either PCI indication or PCI volume. Subsequent revascularization rates were higher at sites without on-site CT surgery facilities (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.42).
This study suggests that providing PCI facilities without on-site CT surgery in an integrated health care system with quality oversight improves patient access without compromising procedural or 1-year outcomes.
临床试验已经证实,在没有现场心胸外科(CT)手术的医疗设施中进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性。然而,在实际实践中,这种策略的比较效果,包括对患者获得途径和结果的影响,尚不确定。自 2005 年以来,退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统一直使用这种策略,并进行严格的质量监督,因此可以为这个问题提供一些见解。
在 2007 年 10 月至 2010 年 9 月期间,在 VA 设施接受 PCI 的 24387 名患者中,有 6616 名(27.1%)患者在没有现场 CT 手术的设施(n=18)接受 PCI。通过设施比较患者的就诊时间(作为就诊途径的替代指标)、手术并发症、1 年死亡率、心肌梗死和随后的血运重建程序的发生率。结果按手术指征(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死/不稳定型心绞痛与择期)和 PCI 量分层。纳入没有现场 CT 手术的 PCI 设施后,在这些设施接受治疗的患者的平均就诊时间减少了 90.8 分钟(P<0.001)。紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术的手术需求和死亡率都很低,并且在各个设施之间相似。调整后的 1 年死亡率和心肌梗死率在各个设施之间相似(无现场 CT 手术设施与有现场 CT 手术设施的 1 年死亡率和心肌梗死率的比值为 1.02;95%置信区间,0.87-1.2),并且不受 PCI 指征或 PCI 量的影响。在没有现场 CT 手术设施的地方,血运重建率更高(比值比,1.21;95%置信区间,1.03-1.42)。
本研究表明,在一个具有质量监督的综合医疗保健系统中提供没有现场 CT 手术的 PCI 设施可以改善患者的就诊途径,而不会影响手术过程或 1 年的结果。