• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严格的计算机化血糖控制对重型颅脑损伤患者神经功能结局的影响:随机对照开放标签CGAO-REA研究的多中心亚组分析

Effects of tight computerized glucose control on neurological outcome in severely brain injured patients: a multicenter sub-group analysis of the randomized-controlled open-label CGAO-REA study.

作者信息

Cinotti Raphaël, Ichai Carole, Orban Jean-Christophe, Kalfon Pierre, Feuillet Fanny, Roquilly Antoine, Riou Bruno, Blanloeil Yvonnick, Asehnoune Karim, Rozec Bertrand

出版信息

Crit Care. 2014 Sep 5;18(5):498. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0498-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-014-0498-9
PMID:25189764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4174656/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hyperglycemia is a marker of poor prognosis in severe brain injuries. There is currently little data regarding the effects of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) on neurological recovery.

METHODS

A sub-group analysis of the randomized-controlled CGAO-REA study (NCT01002482) in surgical intensive care units (ICU) of two university hospitals. Patients with severe brain injury, with an expected ICU length of stay ≥ 48 hours were included. Patients were randomized between a conventional glucose management group (blood glucose target between 5.5 and 9 mmol.L(-1)) and an IIT group (blood glucose target between 4.4 and 6 mmol.L(-1)). The primary outcome was the day-90 neurological outcome evaluated with the Glasgow outcome scale.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were included in this analysis. In total 98 (52%) patients were randomized in the control group and 90 (48%) in the IIT group. The mean Glasgow coma score at baseline was 7 (± 4). Patients in the IIT group received more insulin (130 (68 to 251) IU versus 74 (13 to 165) IU in the control group, P = 0.01), had a significantly lower morning blood glucose level (5.9 (5.1 to 6.7) mmol.L(-1) versus 6.5 (5.6 to 7.2) mmol.L(-1), P <0.001) in the first 5 days after ICU admission. The IIT group experienced more episodes of hypoglycemia (P < 0.0001). In the IIT group 24 (26.6%) patients had a favorable neurological outcome (good recovery or moderate disability) compared to 31 (31.6%) in the control group (P = 0.4). There were no differences in day-28 mortality. The occurrence of hypoglycemia did not influence the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sub-group analysis of a large multicenter randomized trial, IIT did not appear to alter the day-90 neurological outcome or ICU morbidity in severe brain injured patients or ICU morbidity.

摘要

引言

高血糖是重度脑损伤预后不良的一个指标。目前关于强化胰岛素治疗(IIT)对神经功能恢复影响的数据很少。

方法

对两家大学医院外科重症监护病房(ICU)进行的随机对照CGAO - REA研究(NCT01002482)进行亚组分析。纳入预期在ICU住院时间≥48小时的重度脑损伤患者。患者被随机分为传统血糖管理组(血糖目标值在5.5至9 mmol.L⁻¹之间)和IIT组(血糖目标值在4.4至6 mmol.L⁻¹之间)。主要结局是采用格拉斯哥预后量表评估的90天神经功能结局。

结果

本分析共纳入188例患者。总共98例(52%)患者被随机分配至对照组,90例(48%)患者被随机分配至IIT组。基线时格拉斯哥昏迷评分平均为7分(±4)。IIT组患者接受了更多胰岛素治疗(130(68至251)IU,而对照组为74(13至165)IU,P = 0.01),在入住ICU后的前5天,其早晨血糖水平显著更低(5.9(5.1至6.7)mmol.L⁻¹,而对照组为6.5(5.6至7.2)mmol.L⁻¹,P <0.001)。IIT组发生低血糖的次数更多(P <0.0001)。IIT组有24例(26.6%)患者神经功能结局良好(恢复良好或中度残疾),而对照组为31例(31.6%)(P = 0.4)。28天死亡率无差异。低血糖的发生并未影响结局。

结论

在这项大型多中心随机试验的亚组分析中,IIT似乎并未改变重度脑损伤患者的90天神经功能结局或ICU发病率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a429/4174656/e6085c25e9e8/13054_2014_498_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a429/4174656/e6085c25e9e8/13054_2014_498_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a429/4174656/e6085c25e9e8/13054_2014_498_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of tight computerized glucose control on neurological outcome in severely brain injured patients: a multicenter sub-group analysis of the randomized-controlled open-label CGAO-REA study.严格的计算机化血糖控制对重型颅脑损伤患者神经功能结局的影响:随机对照开放标签CGAO-REA研究的多中心亚组分析
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 5;18(5):498. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0498-9.
2
Intensive insulin therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial.重度创伤性脑损伤的强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机试验。
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):904-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9afc2.
3
Blood glucose control among critically ill patients with brain injury.脑损伤重症患者的血糖控制
Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Jul;36(4):436-42. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100007757.
4
Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy in critically ill neurologic patients.重症神经疾病患者强化与常规胰岛素治疗比较。
Neurocrit Care. 2010 Dec;13(3):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9417-3.
5
Intensive versus subcutaneous insulin in patients with hyperacute stroke: results from the randomized INSULINFARCT trial.强化胰岛素治疗与皮下胰岛素治疗超急性期脑卒中患者的效果比较:随机对照 INSULINFARCT 试验结果。
Stroke. 2012 Sep;43(9):2343-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.657122. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
6
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: long-term follow-up of a subgroup of patients from the NICE-SUGAR study.严重颅脑损伤患者强化与常规血糖控制的比较:来自 NICE-SUGAR 研究的亚组患者的长期随访。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):1037-47. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3757-6. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
Hyperglycemia: an independent risk factor for poor outcome in children with traumatic brain injury*.高血糖:创伤性脑损伤患儿预后不良的独立危险因素*
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;15(7):623-31. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000170.
8
Severe and multiple hypoglycemic episodes are associated with increased risk of death in ICU patients.严重且多次低血糖发作与重症监护病房患者的死亡风险增加相关。
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 8;19(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0851-7.
9
Glucose dysregulation and neurological injury biomarkers in critically ill children.危重症患儿的葡萄糖失调与神经损伤生物标志物。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Oct;95(10):4669-79. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0805. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
10
Intensive insulin therapy after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial.重度创伤性脑损伤后的强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(2):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9084-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery.手术治疗糖尿病患者的围手术期血糖控制
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007315.pub3.
2
Expert consensus on the glycemic management of critically ill patients.危重症患者血糖管理专家共识
J Intensive Med. 2022 Jul 8;2(3):131-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.06.001. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Kidney Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: Pathophysiology and General Management.颅脑创伤后肾功能障碍:病理生理学与一般处理。

本文引用的文献

1
Tight computerized versus conventional glucose control in the ICU: a randomized controlled trial.ICU 中强化计算机控制与常规血糖控制的随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Feb;40(2):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3189-0. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
2
Effect of prehospital induction of mild hypothermia on survival and neurological status among adults with cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial.院前轻度低温诱导对心脏骤停成人存活率和神经状态的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):45-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282173.
3
Glucose administration after traumatic brain injury improves cerebral metabolism and reduces secondary neuronal injury.
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Apr;38(2):504-516. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01630-z. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
Glycemic Variability: An Independent Predictor of Mortality and the Impact of Age in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.血糖变异性:儿科重症监护病房死亡率的独立预测因素及年龄的影响
Front Pediatr. 2020 Jul 31;8:403. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00403. eCollection 2020.
5
Effects of perioperative tight glycemic control on postoperative outcomes: a meta-analysis.围手术期严格血糖控制对术后结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Endocr Connect. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):R316-R327. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0231.
6
Therapeutic effect of intensive glycemic control therapy in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.强化血糖控制疗法对创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11671. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011671.
7
Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study.创伤性脑损伤的一般支持性和预防性重症监护管理中的差异:参与协作性欧洲颅脑创伤疗效研究(CENTER-TBI)研究的 66 个神经创伤中心的调查。
Crit Care. 2018 Apr 13;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6.
8
Glycaemic control targets after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颅脑损伤后血糖控制目标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 19;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1883-y.
9
Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia in Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis to Explore the Definition Based on the Trauma Registry Data.应激性高血糖症与糖尿病:基于创伤登记数据的横断面分析以探索其定义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 7;14(12):1527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121527.
10
Targeted treatment in severe traumatic brain injury in the age of precision medicine.精准医学时代重度创伤性脑损伤的靶向治疗
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Oct;33(10):1651-1661. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3562-3. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
创伤性脑损伤后给予葡萄糖可改善脑代谢并减少继发性神经元损伤。
Brain Res. 2013 Oct 16;1535:124-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.044. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
4
Implementation of an evidence-based extubation readiness bundle in 499 brain-injured patients. a before-after evaluation of a quality improvement project.在 499 名脑损伤患者中实施基于证据的拔管准备包。一项质量改进项目的前后评估。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct 15;188(8):958-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201301-0116OC.
5
Half-molar sodium lactate infusion to prevent intracranial hypertensive episodes in severe traumatic brain injured patients: a randomized controlled trial.半量乳酸钠输注预防严重颅脑损伤患者颅内高压发作的随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Aug;39(8):1413-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2978-9. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
6
Barbiturates for acute traumatic brain injury.用于急性创伤性脑损伤的巴比妥类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD000033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000033.pub2.
7
Early management of severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤的早期处理。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1088-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60864-2.
8
Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients.危重症患者低血糖与死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1108-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204942.
9
Dobutamine-induced high cardiac index did not prevent vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a randomized controlled pilot study.多巴酚丁胺诱导的高心指数不能预防蛛网膜下腔出血患者的血管痉挛:一项随机对照的初步研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Oct;17(2):183-90. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9732-y.
10
Tight glycemic control increases metabolic distress in traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled within-subjects trial.严格的血糖控制会增加创伤性脑损伤的代谢紊乱:一项随机对照的within-subjects 试验。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1923-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e0fcc.