Brons Inge, Dreschler Wouter A, Houben Rolph
Academic Medical Center, Clinical and Experimental Audiology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Sep;136(3):1375. doi: 10.1121/1.4892781.
Hearing-aid noise reduction should reduce background noise, but not disturb the target speech. This objective is difficult because noise reduction suffers from a trade-off between the amount of noise removed and signal distortion. It is unknown if this important trade-off differs between normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. This study separated the negative effect of noise reduction (distortion) from the positive effect (reduction of noise) to allow the measurement of the detection threshold for noise-reduction (NR) distortion. Twelve NH subjects and 12 subjects with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss participated in this study. The detection thresholds for distortion were determined using an adaptive procedure with a three-interval, two-alternative forced-choice paradigm. Different levels of distortion were obtained by changing the maximum amount of noise reduction. Participants were also asked to indicate their preferred NR strength. The detection threshold for overall distortion was higher for HI subjects than for NH subjects, suggesting that stronger noise reduction can be applied for HI listeners without affecting the perceived sound quality. However, the preferred NR strength of HI listeners was closer to their individual detection threshold for distortion than in NH listeners. This implies that HI listeners tolerate fewer audible distortions than NH listeners.
助听器降噪应降低背景噪音,但不干扰目标语音。这一目标颇具难度,因为降噪在去除的噪音量和信号失真之间存在权衡。尚不清楚这种重要的权衡在听力正常(NH)和听力受损(HI)的听众之间是否存在差异。本研究将降噪的负面影响(失真)与正面影响(噪音降低)区分开来,以便测量降噪(NR)失真的检测阈值。12名听力正常的受试者和12名轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的受试者参与了本研究。使用具有三区间、二选一强制选择范式的自适应程序确定失真的检测阈值。通过改变最大降噪量获得不同程度的失真。还要求参与者指出他们偏好的NR强度。HI受试者的总体失真检测阈值高于NH受试者,这表明可以对HI听众应用更强的降噪而不影响感知音质。然而,与NH听众相比,HI听众偏好的NR强度更接近他们各自的失真检测阈值。这意味着HI听众比NH听众更不能容忍可听见的失真。