• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体对单麦克风降噪强度的偏好;噪声容忍度和信号失真容忍度之间的权衡。

Individual Listener Preference for Strength of Single-Microphone Noise-Reduction; Trade-off Between Noise Tolerance and Signal Distortion Tolerance.

机构信息

Clinical & Experimental Audiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Pento Audiological Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231192304. doi: 10.1177/23312165231192304.

DOI:10.1177/23312165231192304
PMID:37525630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10395179/
Abstract

There are large interindividual variations in preference for strength of noise-reduction (NR). It is hypothesized that each individual's tolerance for background noise on one hand and signal distortions on the other hand form this preference. We aim to visualize and analyze this so-called trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality. Dutch sentences in stationary background noise were processed with different NR strengths. We used an NR algorithm that allows us to separate the positive effects of NR (noise attenuation) from the negative effects (signal distortion). Stimuli consisted of speech in noise with different degrees of (1) background noise, (2) signal distortions, or (3) both (i.e., realistic NR at different NR strengths). With pairwise comparisons, participants chose which stimulus they preferred for prolonged listening. Twelve listeners with mild to moderate hearing loss participated in the study. For all participants, a trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality was found and visualized. The strength of preference was estimated with the Bradley-Terry-Luce choice model and was different for all individuals but in the same order of magnitude for distortion effects and noise effects. Strength of preference of realistic NR was smaller by a factor of ten. This study used a unique setup to capture the individual trade-off between noise attenuation and signal quality in NR. Disturbance from signal distortions is as important as disturbance from background noise for determining preference for NR strength. Individual listeners differ in their sensitivity to both factors and as a consequence in their preferred NR strength.

摘要

个体之间对降噪(NR)强度的偏好存在很大差异。据推测,个体对背景噪声的容忍度和对信号失真的容忍度共同构成了这种偏好。我们旨在直观地分析和研究这种所谓的噪声衰减和信号质量之间的权衡。在静止背景噪声中处理荷兰语句子时,使用了不同的 NR 强度。我们使用了一种 NR 算法,可以将 NR 的积极影响(噪声衰减)与负面影响(信号失真)分开。刺激物由噪声中的语音组成,具有不同程度的(1)背景噪声、(2)信号失真或(3)两者(即不同 NR 强度下的真实 NR)。通过两两比较,参与者选择他们更喜欢长时间听的刺激。12 名听力轻度至中度受损的听众参与了研究。对于所有参与者,都发现并直观地呈现了噪声衰减和信号质量之间的权衡。偏好强度用 Bradley-Terry-Luce 选择模型进行估计,对所有个体来说都不同,但失真效应和噪声效应的顺序相同。真实 NR 的偏好强度小了一个数量级。本研究使用了一种独特的设置来捕捉 NR 中噪声衰减和信号质量之间的个体权衡。信号失真引起的干扰与背景噪声引起的干扰对确定对 NR 强度的偏好同样重要。个体听众在对这两个因素的敏感性以及因此对其偏好的 NR 强度方面存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/e84a9c39bd48/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/fc5df470e58a/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/14adee2f6917/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/dfd9a8a7142b/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/4a040fb904fe/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/6a73d4831b98/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/8018178782c2/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/68156815d007/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/3414d3e5e1e1/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/48fdd48b8cad/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/e84a9c39bd48/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/fc5df470e58a/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/14adee2f6917/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/dfd9a8a7142b/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/4a040fb904fe/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/6a73d4831b98/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/8018178782c2/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/68156815d007/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/3414d3e5e1e1/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/48fdd48b8cad/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e11/10395179/e84a9c39bd48/10.1177_23312165231192304-fig10.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual Listener Preference for Strength of Single-Microphone Noise-Reduction; Trade-off Between Noise Tolerance and Signal Distortion Tolerance.个体对单麦克风降噪强度的偏好;噪声容忍度和信号失真容忍度之间的权衡。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231192304. doi: 10.1177/23312165231192304.
2
Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?双耳降噪导致的不同信号变化的感知后果:听力损失和工作记忆容量起作用吗?
Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e213-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000054.
3
Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.正常听力和听力障碍者的降噪偏好强度。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231211437. doi: 10.1177/23312165231211437.
4
Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.正常听力和听力受损听众中降噪产生的声音失真检测阈值。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Sep;136(3):1375. doi: 10.1121/1.4892781.
5
Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?听力损失和认知功能是否会调节不同双耳降噪设置带来的益处?
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):e52-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000003.
6
Subjective evaluation of single microphone noise reduction with different time constants.不同时间常数下单麦克风降噪的主观评估。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov;58(11):780-789. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1641231. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.追踪噪声耐受性以衡量助听器效果。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Sep;28(8):698-707. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16053.
8
Left Lateralization of the Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential Reflects Aided Processing and Speech-in-Noise Performance of Older Listeners With a Hearing Loss.皮质听觉诱发电位的左侧化反映了老年听力损失患者的助听加工及噪声环境下言语表现。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(2):399-410. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001293. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.降噪对听力障碍者言语可懂度、感知聆听努力程度和个人偏好的影响。
Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 13;18:2331216514553924. doi: 10.1177/2331216514553924.
10
Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.数字降噪对听力损失儿童言语感知的影响。
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):345-55. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cda9ce.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward an Extended Classification of Noise-Distortion Preferences by Modeling Longitudinal Dynamics of Listening Choices.通过对听力选择的纵向动态进行建模实现噪声-失真偏好的扩展分类
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165251362018. doi: 10.1177/23312165251362018. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Neural-WDRC: A Deep Learning Wide Dynamic Range Compression Method Combined With Controllable Noise Reduction for Hearing Aids.神经宽动态范围压缩:一种结合可控降噪的深度学习宽动态范围压缩方法用于助听器。
Trends Hear. 2025 Jan-Dec;29:23312165241309301. doi: 10.1177/23312165241309301.

本文引用的文献

1
Relation between hearing abilities and preferred playback settings for speech perception in complex listening conditions.在复杂聆听环境下,听力能力与言语感知偏好的重放设置之间的关系。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Nov;61(11):965-974. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1980233. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
Preferences for digital noise reduction and microphone mode settings in hearing-impaired listeners with low and high tolerances for background noise.对背景噪声容忍度低和高的听力受损者对数字降噪和麦克风模式设置的偏好。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Feb;59(2):90-100. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1671615. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Subjective evaluation of single microphone noise reduction with different time constants.
不同时间常数下单麦克风降噪的主观评估。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Nov;58(11):780-789. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1641231. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children.对成人和儿童助听器单麦克风降噪研究的批判性综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Aug;13(6):600-608. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1392619. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Exploring Hearing Aid Problems: Perspectives of Hearing Aid Owners and Clinicians.探索助听器问题:助听器使用者和临床医生的观点。
Ear Hear. 2018 Jan/Feb;39(1):172-187. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000477.
6
Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?单麦克风降噪方案的比较:听力受损的听众能分辨出差异吗?
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S55-S61. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1279758. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
7
Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.基于个体特征估计的助听器验配与微调。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S139-S145. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1257163. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
8
Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users.研究助听器使用者对降噪强度的偏好差异。
Trends Hear. 2016 Sep 7;20:2331216516655794. doi: 10.1177/2331216516655794.
9
Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.助听器中降噪与压缩的声学及感知比较
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Aug 1;58(4):1363-76. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0347.
10
Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.数字噪声抑制中信号保真度、听力损失与工作记忆之间的关系。
Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):505-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000173.