Rochus Kristel, Cools An, Janssens Geert P J, Vanhaecke Lynn, Wuyts Birgitte, Lockett Trevor, Clarke Julie M, Fievez Veerle, Hesta Myriam
Laboratory of Animal Nutrition , Department of Nutrition , Genetics and Ethology , Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Ghent University , Heidestraat 19 , B-9820 Merelbeke , Belgium.
Laboratory of Chemical Analysis , Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety , Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Ghent University , Salisburylaan 133 , B-9820 Merelbeke , Belgium.
J Nutr Sci. 2014 Aug 13;3:e16. doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.18. eCollection 2014.
In strict carnivorous domestic cats, a metabolic competition arises between the need to use amino acids for gluconeogenesis and for protein synthesis both in health and disease. The present study investigated the amino acid-sparing potential of propionic acid in cats using dietary propionylated starch (HAMSP) supplementation. A total of thirty cats were fed a homemade diet, supplemented with either HAMSP, acetylated starch (HAMSA) or celite (Control) for three adaptation weeks. Propionylated starch was hypothesised to provide propionic acid as an alternative gluconeogenic substrate to amino acids, whereas acetic acid from HAMSA would not provide any gluconeogenic benefit. Post-adaptation, a 5-d total faecal collection was carried out to calculate apparent protein digestibility coefficients. Fresh faecal and blood samples were collected to analyse fermentation endproducts and metabolites. The apparent protein digestibility coefficients did not differ between supplements (P = 0·372) and were not affected by the protein intake level (P = 0·808). Faecal propionic acid concentrations were higher in HAMSP than in HAMSA (P = 0·018) and Control (P = 0·003) groups, whereas concentrations of ammonia (P = 0·007) were higher in HAMSA than in HAMSP cats. Tendencies for or higher propionylcarnitine concentrations were observed in HAMSP compared with HAMSA (P = 0·090) and Control (P = 0·037) groups, and for tiglyl- + 3-methylcrotonylcarnitine concentrations in HAMSP as compared with Control (P = 0·028) cats. Methylmalonylcarnitine concentrations did not differ between groups (P = 0·740), but were negatively correlated with the protein intake level (r -0·459, P = 0·016). These results suggest that HAMSP cats showed more saccharolytic fermentation patterns than those supplemented with HAMSA, as well as signs of sparing of valine in cats with a sufficient protein intake.
在严格肉食性的家猫中,无论健康还是患病状态下,在将氨基酸用于糖异生和蛋白质合成的需求之间都会出现代谢竞争。本研究使用添加了膳食丙酰化淀粉(HAMSP)的方法,研究了丙酸在家猫体内节省氨基酸的潜力。总共30只猫被喂食自制日粮,在为期三周的适应期内分别添加HAMSP、乙酰化淀粉(HAMSA)或硅藻土(对照组)。丙酰化淀粉被假定为可提供丙酸作为氨基酸的替代糖异生底物,而HAMSA中的乙酸不会带来任何糖异生益处。适应期过后,进行了为期5天的粪便总收集以计算表观蛋白质消化率系数。采集新鲜粪便和血液样本以分析发酵终产物和代谢物。各补充组之间的表观蛋白质消化率系数没有差异(P = 0·372),且不受蛋白质摄入量水平的影响(P = 0·808)。HAMSP组粪便中的丙酸浓度高于HAMSA组(P = 0·018)和对照组(P = 0·003),而HAMSA组猫体内的氨浓度(P = 0·007)高于HAMSP组。与HAMSA组(P = 0·090)和对照组(P = 0·037)相比,HAMSP组中观察到丙酰肉碱浓度有升高趋势,与对照组相比(P = 0·028),HAMSP组中惕格酰 - + 3 - 甲基巴豆酰肉碱浓度也有升高趋势。各实验组之间甲基丙二酸单酰肉碱浓度没有差异(P = 0·740),但与蛋白质摄入量水平呈负相关(r -0·459,P = 0·016)。这些结果表明,与补充HAMSA的猫相比,HAMSP组的猫表现出更多的糖分解发酵模式,并且在蛋白质摄入量充足的猫中也有缬氨酸节省的迹象。