Quinn Andrew M, Klepeis Veronica E, Mandelker Diana L, Platt Mia Y, Rao Luigi K F, Riedlinger Gregory, Baron Jason M, Brodsky Victor, Kim Ji Yeon, Lane William, Lee Roy E, Levy Bruce P, McClintock David S, Beckwith Bruce A, Kuo Frank C, Gilbertson John R
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Pathol Inform. 2014 Jul 30;5(1):22. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.137717. eCollection 2014.
The Partners HealthCare system's Clinical Fellowship in Pathology Informatics (Boston, MA, USA) faces ongoing challenges to the delivery of its core curriculum in the forms of: (1) New classes of fellows annually with new and varying educational needs and increasingly fractured, enterprise-wide commitments; (2) taxing electronic health record (EHR) and laboratory information system (LIS) implementations; and (3) increasing interest in the subspecialty at the academic medical centers (AMCs) in what is a large health care network. In response to these challenges, the fellowship has modified its existing didactic sessions and piloted both a network-wide pathology informatics lecture series and regular "learning laboratories". Didactic sessions, which had previously included more formal discussions of the four divisions of the core curriculum: Information fundamentals, information systems, workflow and process, and governance and management, now focus on group discussions concerning the fellows' ongoing projects, updates on the enterprise-wide EHR and LIS implementations, and directed questions about weekly readings. Lectures are given by the informatics faculty, guest informatics faculty, current and former fellows, and information systems members in the network, and are open to all professional members of the pathology departments at the AMCs. Learning laboratories consist of small-group exercises geared toward a variety of learning styles, and are driven by both the fellows and a member of the informatics faculty. The learning laboratories have created a forum for discussing real-time and real-world pathology informatics matters, and for incorporating awareness of and timely discussions about the latest pathology informatics literature. These changes have diversified the delivery of the fellowship's core curriculum, increased exposure of faculty, fellows and trainees to one another, and more equitably distributed teaching responsibilities among the entirety of the pathology informatics asset in the network. Though the above approach has been in place less than a year, we are presenting it now as a technical note to allow for further discussion of evolving educational opportunities in pathology informatics and clinical informatics in general, and to highlight the importance of having a flexible fellowship with active participation from its fellows.
美国马萨诸塞州波士顿的合作伙伴医疗保健系统病理学信息学临床研究员项目在其核心课程的交付上面临着持续的挑战,具体表现为:(1)每年有新一批研究员,他们有着新的、不同的教育需求,且整个企业范围内的投入日益分散;(2)电子健康记录(EHR)和实验室信息系统(LIS)的实施任务繁重;(3)在这个大型医疗保健网络中,学术医疗中心(AMC)对该亚专业的兴趣日益浓厚。针对这些挑战,该研究员项目修改了现有的教学课程,并试点了全网络范围的病理学信息学讲座系列和定期的“学习实验室”。以前的教学课程包括对核心课程四个部分的更正式讨论:信息基础、信息系统、工作流程与过程以及治理与管理,现在则侧重于关于研究员正在进行的项目的小组讨论、企业范围内EHR和LIS实施的最新情况,以及关于每周阅读材料的定向问题。讲座由信息学教员、客座信息学教员、现任和前任研究员以及网络中的信息系统成员进行,对AMC病理学系的所有专业成员开放。学习实验室由针对多种学习风格的小组练习组成,由研究员和信息学教员之一推动。学习实验室创建了一个论坛,用于讨论实时和现实世界中的病理学信息学问题,并纳入对最新病理学信息学文献的认识和及时讨论。这些变化使研究员项目核心课程的交付方式更加多样化,增加了教员、研究员和学员之间的接触,并在网络中病理学信息学资源的整体范围内更公平地分配了教学责任。尽管上述方法实施不到一年,但我们现在将其作为一篇技术说明呈现,以便进一步讨论病理学信息学以及一般临床信息学中不断发展的教育机会,并强调拥有一个研究员积极参与的灵活研究员项目的重要性。