Inra Jennifer A, Pelletier Stephen, Kumar Navin L, Barnes Edward L, Shields Helen M
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 May 26;8:359-364. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S135538. eCollection 2017.
Traditional didactic lectures are the mainstay of teaching for graduate medical education, although this method may not be the most effective way to transmit information. We created an active learning curriculum for Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) gastroenterology fellows to maximize learning. We evaluated whether this new curriculum improved perceived knowledge acquisition and knowledge base. In addition, our study assessed whether coaching faculty members in specific methods to enhance active learning improved their perceived teaching and presentation skills.
We compared the Gastroenterology Training Exam (GTE) scores before and after the implementation of this curriculum to assess whether an improved knowledge base was documented. In addition, fellows and faculty members were asked to complete anonymous evaluations regarding their learning and teaching experiences.
Fifteen fellows were invited to 12 lectures over a 2-year period. GTE scores improved in the areas of stomach (<0.001), general gastroenterology (=0.005), esophagus (<0.001), and small bowel (=0.001), and the total score (=0.001) between pre- and postimplementation of the active learning curriculum. Scores in hepatology, as well as biliary and pancreatic study, showed a trend toward improvement (>0.05). All fellows believed the lectures were helpful, felt more prepared to take the GTE, and preferred the interactive format to traditional didactic lectures. All lecturers agreed that they acquired new teaching skills, improved teaching and presentation skills, and learned new tools that could help them teach better in the future.
An active learning curriculum is preferred by GI fellows and may be helpful for improving transmission of information in any specialty in medical education. Individualized faculty coaching sessions demonstrating new ways to transmit information may be important for an individual faculty member's teaching excellence.
传统的讲授式讲座是毕业后医学教育教学的主要方式,尽管这种方法可能不是传递信息的最有效方式。我们为布莱根妇女医院(BWH)的胃肠病学研究员创建了一个主动学习课程,以实现学习效果最大化。我们评估了这个新课程是否提高了感知的知识获取和知识基础。此外,我们的研究评估了指导教员采用特定方法来加强主动学习是否提高了他们感知的教学和演示技能。
我们比较了该课程实施前后的胃肠病学培训考试(GTE)成绩,以评估是否记录到知识基础得到改善。此外,研究员和教员被要求完成关于他们学习和教学经历的匿名评估。
在两年时间里,15名研究员参加了12次讲座。主动学习课程实施前后,胃(<0.001)、普通胃肠病学(=0.005)、食管(<0.001)和小肠(=0.001)领域的GTE成绩有所提高,总成绩(=0.001)也有所提高。肝病学以及胆道和胰腺研究的成绩呈改善趋势(>0.05)。所有研究员都认为讲座很有帮助,感觉为参加GTE考试准备得更充分了,并且更喜欢互动形式而非传统的讲授式讲座。所有讲师都同意他们获得了新的教学技能,提高了教学和演示技能,并学到了有助于他们未来更好教学的新工具。
胃肠病学研究员更喜欢主动学习课程,这可能有助于改善医学教育中任何专业的信息传递。展示传递信息新方法的个性化教员辅导课程可能对个别教员的卓越教学很重要。